Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog

2011-12-18T09:00:00.001-05:00

Something's gotta give; The Garons and Benisko murders

By: Daniel M. Deilgat

Toronto, Ontario

An article claimed this week that the Toronto police investigators never forget, they nabbed a suspect in a murder case that dates back to the eighties. That made me wonder if I would want to know thirty years later who killed my daughter... More importantly, I wondered if in fact the investigators had the means and, the budgets, to really lean into the case, to really work at it.

The truth however is that law enforcement is an imperfect system. Investigators bound by the realities of financial constraints and bulging case files, politicians that are more committed to directing funding where it better accommodates their careers than the lives of some poor sap that, eventually, would have croaked anyway...

That a federal Chief Justice, his wife and their friend were slaughtered and that the RCMP is doing more to suppress evidence in the case than it is actually doing to advance the arrest of suspects they have known now for more than two years, is a perfect example of just how far politicians are willing to go.

Yes, the RCMP is acting on orders that come straight from the PMO, those orders provided the Conservative government a majority and the power for Prime Minister Harper to protect the Conservative brand and in the same stretch, his former senior advisor, The Right Honourable Brian mulroney.

The Garon/Beniskos murders are, an extension of the circumstances called the Airbus scandal, circumstances whereas Brian mulroney accepted cash donations from an arms dealer- Karlheinz Schreiber, a middle man that acted in the Airbus case at the request of an old friend of his, for Engelbert Schreiber Sr., a banker involved in everything from drug money laundering to terrorism financing.

Karlheinz Schreiber knows I am right, his accountant admitted to a Parliamentary committee of his ties with Engelbert Schreiber Sr, in fact, Karlheinz rather would go to jail than actually tell the truth about how mulroney was bribed.

Prime Minister Harper, not unlike his Liberal predecessors has political capital in the Airbus case. The Liberals were comfortable hiding behind the national security statutes however, the Conservatives of Stephen Harper couldn't be afforded the same comfort, Brian mulroney, for all practical purposes, is the poster boy for the Conservative party of recent history.

mulroney is a politician that never hesitated to shove his head right to the bottom of the trough- a direct quote.

To understand the Garon/Beniskos murders one must follow the political capital and that cash is in a trough where all you can see is Brian Mulroney and Stephen Harper bent over with their heads sunk deep below their knees.

The decision to kill Justice Garon became an attack on the Canadian Justice System by the political apparatus when Prime Ministers of Canada sought a solidarity that went beyond party loyalties and a decision was born whereas it was justified that the murder of a Federal Chief Justice outweighed the embarrassment that both the Conservatives of Stephen Harper and Brian mulroney would have had to endure.

In an era of Harper Conservatives, killing federal judges can be justified.

John Patrick O'Neill (February 6, 1952 – September 11, 2001).

2011-09-09T20:54:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat

Toronto, Ontario

dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Some asked me why I never wrote about how 9/11 happened to me, how I saw it.

I asked; “what do you mean how it happened to me?

Those individuals that asked, still think that I could have done more, that I should have done something... When I wrote about how we identified the guys that recruited the Toronto eighteen, these same individuals argued that obviously I knew something that I should have conveyed to the authorities…

That the Canadian authorities knew well before me, is a fact that they would never considered.

Let’s go back to August of 2001.

Back in August of 2001 I contacted the RCMP, again, about a case whereas my client- a Canadian public company had been robbed of in excess of three hundred and forty million dollars. I had been in contact with the RCMP at that point since 1994, and the RCMP was aware that elements of our case involved financing of the Muslim Brotherhood activities through bankers that had handled funds stolen from my client, a company represented at the time by the law firm of Clark, Wilson in Vancouver.

Officer in charge Bennington was stumped, he couldn’t explain why such a clear case of theft couldn’t be investigated by the force so, and he decided to appoint Sgt Fozard to our case. Bennington, humorously- it seemed at the time, unilaterally decided that Sgt. Fozard would make himself available on Tuesday the 11^th of September 2001 at nine AM sharp to receive my call and lay the ground work for an RCMP investigation…

It wouldn’t be until the thirteenth of September of that year that I would finally understand that Bennington had a functionary sense of humor. He set that date because there were rumors at the RCMP that something big would happen on that day, an event that no RCMP officer was ready to lend any credibility to… A conspiracy theorists premonition of some sort…

The RCMP had advanced knowledge of the attacks and they thought it was funny...

On September 13^th of 2001- or there about, two RCMP agents were dispatched to meet with me in Toronto at the request of Prime Minister Chretien’s office. One of them as he walked into the place of business looked at me, and before we had a chance to introduce each other he said; these Republicans have gone mad, the world is coming to an end… At that moment I knew that Bennington had fucked me over.

So for those of you that think that I should have done more, you should be so lucky that you weren’t on these planes.

In time it became clear to the Canadian and American authorities that I had been right back in 1994, that I had been right about Peter Michael Bond, the Isle of Man banker that handled some of the monies destined for the highjackers that executed the attacks. In fact, the Justice Department in the United States has granted Bond immunity that rivals that of the President of the United States, but moreover, after an investigation led by Senator Levin on the role of Riggs Bank in the financing of the 9/11 attacks, the RCMP knew that they had messed up big time…

Then it got even worst for the Canadian excuse of a federal police force, Bond was also the guy that had handled funds paid secretly to Brian Mulroney a former Prime Minister of Canada. Mulroney, as it turns out, had investments in a construction project in Telluride Colorado, the money Mulroney invested was illicit commissions he had received from Airbus industries that were invested by his lawyer and blind trust manager, Bruce Vercheres, a Montreal tax attorney whom also represented famed author Arthur Hailey and the family of slain Italian banker, Roberto Calvi.

The RCMP, in time, was dealing with a so called wholly trinity of crimes, the murder of Roberto Calvi- a banker with close ties to the Vatican that was represented initially by the Montreal power house lawyers Ogilvy, Renault- Mulroney’s former and eventual firm, the Airbus kick back case whereas it was alleged that Brian Mulroney was paid millions to facilitate the purchase of Airbus aircrafts by Air Canada and, my client’s case, a theft of in excess of three hundred million dollars.

That some Arabs would fly planes into the World Trade Center in New York City and kill thousands was a concept that small town RCMP just couldn’t conceive.

Shortly before the Oliphant Commission was appointed by Prime Minister Harper, a retired Chief Justice of the Canadian tax court was murdered savagely in his Ottawa home. The death of Chief Justice Garon- a man honored by Brian Mulroney himself at the Quebec Bar, just about sealed the Airbus case in favor of Mulroney, no witness’ could show up.

In the end what is the life of a retired Chief Justice worth when the RCMP had so much more to hide…

To those who have asked me “how 9/11 happened to me”, I tell you this; if you have to ask, you should have been a victim that day, you should be a victim now.

I am a victim, cursed with life and the reminder of the friend I lost that day, a man who died trying to save others- John Patrick O’Neill, so the RCMP could protect The Right Honourable Brian Martin Mulroney- a former Prime Minister of Canada.

Welcome to the South Lands; Billy Elliot goes to the UN on behalf of Interpol

2011-08-18T21:26:00.001-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat

Toronto, Ontario

dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

I guess the first thing would be to say, good riddance.

Now for the two of you that have been reading my blog faithfully for the past five years, what can I say… There are no idiots that would be handed the reins of the RCMP, but then again, hookers are not out of the question, and Elliot was certainly a whore.

Some would say Harper’s bitch.

I said enough, but following are consecutive comments following the CBC news article that you can read here: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/08/18/elliott-interpol.html

tobone

tobone2011/08/18
at 8:12 PM ET"will work to facillitate and enhance co-operation....." What a flaming bad joke on poor old interpol. What did interpol do to deserve getting this idiot by way of the Harper government.
They couldn't possibly be getting a LESS QUALIFIED person for these functions.

Who said the 'Peter Principle' was forgotten ? ? Perfect example of it's validity.

· dashwood2011/08/18
at 8:01 PM ETHe described the RCMP as "one of the best-known and most respected police agencies in the world."

he left out 'until they hired me'.

what is interpol, the dumping ground for incompetent rcmp commissioners?

elliot could not run a two hole outhouse, neither could zaccardelli.

maybe together......

interpol is now considerably weaker.Rating3Agree　with comment (3 thumbs up)Disagree with comment (0 thumbs down)Reply Policy Report abuse (0)

· KenDavies2011/08/18
at 7:42 PM ET

Just look at the mess in Kelowna and they had the guts to say we live in a safe City and the public was not at risk. Get rid of the RCMP.

KenDavies2011/08/18
at 7:40 PM ET

This guy is a total joke.

· AvalonKnight2011/08/18
at 7:22 PM ETwell let the un babysit him, they deserve each other

elemental2011/08/18
at 6:37 PM ETwow - what info does he have on someone? How is it that no matter your (public) track record someone in the boys club is willing to hire you

johnny572011/08/18
at 6:36 PM ETwhat a joke .. but then again the U.N is a joke

Curtains2011/08/18
at 6:36 PM ETThe last RCMP Commissioner, (the idiot that had Canadians buy him a $5,000 pair of riding boots, the one with a lisp), the one that was accused of fraud, also went to interpol.

It must be where all the idiots end up !

Brendaat542011/08/18
at 6:23 PM ETYes, after about four months of him pulling his tantrums the UN just might send him to Lybya and tell him that the bulls-eye target on the back of his suits is his security pass so he doesn't have to get all upset about pulling out his security pass. Good luck to them and good riddance and thanks for nothing to him.

vicarious12011/08/18
at 6:06 PM ETSurprised? NOT.
It' who you know and who's shoulders you have rubbed up there.

I know now what to do, to get a top job at INTERPOL like the previous RCMP top man who also moved to INTERPOL after accused of fraud etc.

How much more do we need of rubbing in our face that the top "can do no wrong"?

Try to be seen as "needing anger management" in your every day office job and then wait for a promotion.

Only at Gov. level in this glorious Canada people laugh out loud at civilities and laws of the people. It's the same for criminals. They get sent to jail for 18 years for heavy offenses abduction and rape etc and the same day we are told they will be eligible for probation at 9 year and then a bit of "good conduct" and they are out in 4-5 years. Just enough to ride out the economic crisis in the 24/7 assisted prison facilities. Way better then most senior retirement homes who sure have no assistance 24/7 with sports doctors restaurant learning facilties and and and food and a roof over your head guaranteed.
Canada is fast on the way into becoming a laughing stock for criminals.

Curtains2011/08/18
at 6:02 PM ETThe Muffin Police must be happy, they couldn't get rid of this idiot fast enough.

What an arrogant bureaucrat, that stupid little grin on his face, as if to say, "I'm set for life now".

Canadians see right through you, Mr. Elliot.

Socialistboy2011/08/18
at 5:55 PM ETCongrats Mr. Elliott and thank you for your service .. Best wishes for the future :-)

Stevie Cameron, the relative truth of the Airbus scandal and the killing of a Federal Chief Justice, Alban Garon.

2011-07-21T18:36:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat.

Toronto, Ontario

dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Don’t send a journalist to do an investigator’s job. - Me.

In my first phone conversation with Stevie Cameron I set out to see just how much she knew about money laundering and the intricacies of the trade. She represented to me that she hired some guy who is a friend of a friend of an RCMP officer whom in turn, might have heard something on the QT about Airbus.

Philip Mathias- the guy that broke the Airbus story wide open stating the involvement of Mulroney by quoting a letter from the Canadian Justice Department to the Swiss authorities, once wrote that Stevie Cameron was a culinary critic before she went on to investigative journalism but, in an afternoon drive I took with him north of Toronto, he referred me to Ms. Cameron as the “Big Gun” on the Airbus story, right after he commented about Gloria Galloway’s jugs…- I dealt with Galloway in the past that’s how she got into the conversation, in regards to yet another murder case were innocent parents were railroaded by the CAS and the Hamilton police. That was the case of Maliek Willie, a case I still hold close in my thoughts.

I almost asked Phillip that morning if he ever suspected that it was Conrad Black that had put that letter in his in box… After all, Philip was on the highway to the rest of his life and it seemed logical that a newspaper owner would chose a journalist that most likely would kick the bucket before litigation goes into full gear. Furthermore we saw that, during the Oliphant inquiry with Doucet, the guy who remembered that he forgot… That led me to question Edward Greenspan’s role as attorney for Karlheinz Schreiber after Greenspan was retained by The Black in his Chicago episode. I wondered just how Schreiber would feel if he knew that the guy suspected of dropping the letter that brought him so much grief was now represented by his lawyer… I wanted to discuss this with Karlheinz but then the conversation took a dramatic turn when he mentioned that he tried to hire my former attorney in Montreal, James A. Woods.

Little did Schreiber knew, Woods was the attorney that Brian Mulroney turned to when he referred the Calvi family over to Woods law firm after his own attorney had shot himself twice in the head… For those who don’t know, Roberto Calvi was the Chairman of an Italian bank called Banco Ambrosianno. Calvi was found dead under the Blackfriars bridge in London with roughly ten grand in his pockets and a business card of Ogilvy, Renault, Mulroney’s firm…

When Mulroney became king of Canada, he caused for the Calvi file to be transferred to Bruce Vercheres- his lawyer and the guy that needed two shots to aim at his own head… After Vercheres, Mulroney chose my attorney to seal the deal with the insurers, can anyone spell incestuous?

Black is a thief, he was convicted of the crime and, he might be the guy that took the letter from Mulroney’s PR guy and dropped it in Mathias’ in-box. Either way you cut it, Mathias did little to contribute to the legitimacy of Canadian journalism.

Yes I know Philip, you’ve threatened to sue me before, I might be worth a few millions one day so, there.

Now, what has that to do with Stevie Cameron you might ask? Well, a whole hell of a lot about how journalists seem immune to completing what they started. I recall Stevie Cameron’s testimony in front of the ethics’ committee that was studying the Mulroney/Schreiber/Airbus circumstances at a time when it became public that Brian Mulroney- a senior advisor to Prime Minister Harper, was now suspected of having ties with individuals accused of having played a role in the financing of the 9/11 attacks. Cameron felt so smug that she even afforded to lie to the committee- now when have you heard of journalists suing someone… usually it’s the other way around isn’t it? Well I guess I’ll find out when she reads this…

Stevie Cameron was asked by Mr. Sukh Dhaliwal:

In the years since Blue Trust came out, have you come across any other information? You said you haven't, but I am focusing on information relating to Mr. Verchere that would concern this committee's mandate.

To which she answered:

Ms. Stevie Cameron:

My short answer would be no.

There is not one member of that committee at the time that believed her because they all had a copy of the e-mails she had sent me in reply to questions I had asked her. The Chairman of the committee couldn’t resist the temptation when he asked Ms. Cameron the following:

The Chair:

Thank you, Mr. Hiebert.

We've had one round. We're going to do this again.

I am a little concerned that people are asking you about your general opinion, as opposed to your knowledge of facts or attributions to people. I think we should all sharpen up our questions to find out whether there's new information. We're going to assume the books.... They're on the public record.

Maybe I'll simply ask you, since these hearings started and your name became associated with potentially being one of the witnesses—and indeed you're one of the ten, other than the two principals—whether anybody has contacted you and offered you information or made any other statements to you that would influence your appearance before this committee.

Aside from the obvious, which are the numerous e-mails back and forth between Ms. Cameron and myself you can re

ad the following which is dated August the fourth 2006, a full six months before her testimony in front of the committee:

From: Stevie Cameron [stevie@steviecameron.com]

Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:49 PM

To: 'Daniel Deilgat'

Subject: RE: One last thing

Hi Daniel,

Yes, I have received everything and I am trying to digest all the bits and pieces.

I knew Jock was working for Kroll of course but it never occurred to me that he might be passing on the material to anyone other that his colleagues at the Fifth Estate and at Der Spiegel.

When it came to the Airbus story Jock was initially hired by Mathias von Blemencron at Spiegel, the first journalist to get a whiff of the true story. (All this is in The Last Amigo.) They were first on the scene with Schreiber’s accountant, Giorgio Pelossi. Spiegel needed a Canadian partner and asked Jock to approach the Fifth Estate. Jock gave the CBC and Spiegel all my files – almost all of which the Mounties never saw from me. I only gave them news clippings, and only after the stories appeared of course. All of that was between January and June of 1995.

My own real research on the story began in 1996 and was then dropped as I could not get anything worth publishing; I only began again in 1999-2000 when I and I eventually took on Harvey Cashore. We published in the spring of 2001. I think people believe I turned over all the research we had to the RCMP – which never happened. Remember, whatever I told them was nearly five years earlier, in January, 1995, when I knew very little. And all of this was with the agreement – even encouragement of my editors.

Certainly I hoped to get the scoop on the Mulroney investigation but I never did – and that investigation did not begin formally until November or December of 1995. I think when people think I helped the RCMP they forget the importance of the dates in all this – I had no help from the Mounties nor did I give them any help in their formal investigation; indeed, I did not trust them and stayed far away from them.

But I always knew the CBC had helped the Mounties – probably not Harvey but others. And I am certain they received the box of files I gave Jock. He didn’t give them back to me until the spring or summer of 1995.

At some point I will go through your comments and tell you which are accurate and which are not as they involve me. I know this story has been confusing and distorted and I am sure you want to know what is right and what is not correct.

I cannot remember dealing with Barbara Kelly at all.

As for Judge Then, it seems to me his hearing was less about me than about finding out if the search warrant the Mounties used to raid Eurocopter in 1999 was faulty. If they claimed me as a confidential informant in that warrant, then it was faulty. There is a legal process involved in making someone a CI – it requires a contract, a number and sometimes even money. I was never contacted, never signed a contract, never given a number, never paid. I was never told that I was a subject of the secret hearing that began in 1999 or 2000 in Toronto and Supt. Matthews lied to me and to my lawyer on many occasions, especially after I wrote him to reject the CI status.

As you know I rejected the CI status as soon as I confirmed it had actually happened; something I did not know for sure until around Christmas of 2003.

Only when my lawyer challenged him in court in 2004 did Matthews admit he had not told me he had made me a CI. He also was forced to admit I had given the RCMP an inconsequential and small amount of information and that the vaunted 686 contacts I had had with them in fact amounted to no more than 4 or 6.

So Judge Then’s job, as I understand it, is not to judge me at all but to decide whether or not to throw out the RCMP’s 1999 search warrant – reducing their Eurocopter case to zero. My guess is he will not, using the Charter argument that to do so – even if mistakes were made - would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

Stevie

From: Daniel Deilgat [mailto:dandeilgat@yahoo.ca]
Sent: August 4, 2006 2:20 PM
To: Stevie Cameron
Subject: One last thing

Ms. Cameron,

I trust that you have received mine of yesterday to Judge Then.

As you can now appreciate, their was more to Kensington that met the eye.

I was a lead investigator in the race to list the Hussein assets in 1991 - 1992 and as such, I was aware of the competition and in fact the exchange of information between sources and investigators from Kroll. One thing I had never much felt comfortable with was the fact that the RCMP kept denying the fact that they had abilities to investigate overseas while they did retain the services of Kroll.

When I make mistakes targets make statements, move information, in short they lead us to the thruth. It's an old strategy.

Many individuals are upset with my letters to judge Then and I already am feeling the heat...

Good luck to you and, on behalf of my clients, Thank you for your determination and your mistakes.

Daniel M. Deilgat.

Make free worldwide PC-to-PC calls. Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger with Voice

In previous conversations over the phone I had told Ms. Cameron that the RCMP had asked me to provide to the CBC evidence I had produced to the RCMP’s Vancouver detachment in 1994. In that packages was information about an Isle of Man company that had invested in a condo project in Telluride Colorado. The same company that developed the condo project that Bruce Verchere had invested into on behalf of Brian Mulroney according to sources in the government of the Isle of Man and employees of Riggs-Valmet.

So when Paul Szabo asked Ms. Cameron if she had any new information about the case, she lied.

It was during that period that I began to receive information that the safety of witness might be at risk. I warned Ms. Cameron and Harvey Cashore of the CBC. I couldn’t point out exactly how or who but I thought I would give them a heads up.

A few months later, Justice Garon was murdered, and Ms. Cameron was right, even I sometimes make mistakes.

Ms. Cameron lied about Engelbert Schreiber- the other Schreiber that actually handled the Airbus commissions paid to Mulroney. She lied because the RCMP squeezed her proverbial journalistic nuts.

The secret to living with a murder on your conscience is in you’re beliefs… The Alban Garon Murders’ darker aftermath.

2011-06-29T20:47:00.002-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat

Toronto, Ontario

dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

The legal and litigation implications under Canada’s and the United States’ criminal codes here are probably something that police investigators, Crown Attorneys and District Attorneys have never seen before in their collective careers.

On the one hand you have; a Federal Chief Justice was savagely murdered, in his house, along with his wife and a neighbor. Then you have a former head of state that involved the venerable judge in dealings which, much to Garon’s irrelevant hindsight, are to say the least, inconceivable…

Then you have this guy-me, who’s clients have lost in excess of three hundred and forty million dollars, and there is no way on earth that I will lose my name for some fucking idiot- and I don’t mean Brian Mulroney or Stephen Harper, just because some punk is disturbed by the fact that Mulroney's tax attorney has fucked and knocked up the baby sitter of his gay son. To you I can say this, there are more heads of state afraid of me, then there are people that even have a clue of who I am, but you might know this by now.

This is a post addressed to the murderer of Justice Garon but it is also for the benefit of The Right Honourable Brian Martin Mulroney and the other Right Honourable, Stephen Harper.

To the killer I can say this, I will protect your identity, and I will make sure that nobody knows who you are. I will let you live with the guilt and how it affects you every single day. Killing someone is easy; I would rather write about you and torment you for as long as it takes.

You might say that I will kill you with torment.

It’s one thing for you to know what you’ve done; it’s another to know that at any time someone could drop names and evidence- but not while your mother is alive…

And then there is the integrity of the Prime Minister’s Office.

I don't expect you to write and frankly I have better things to do than to read anything you might have to say and you should know this, your mistake is a great opportunity for me...

The Alban Garon Murder, Airbus and Canada’s Prime Minister, The Right Hon. Stephen Harper.

2011-06-19T21:20:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat

Toronto, Ontario

dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Here we go again with the Garon murder. Today an article tells us that over a year ago an elite team of detectives from the OPP were asked to look at the case, which is now dubbed one of Canada’s most puzzling cases…

Before his death, I had several conversations with a man that claimed to be Arthur Hailey- renowned author of such novels as Airport and Detectives. Hailey asked me to promise that I wouldn’t write about this publicly in order to protect the children of his youngest daughter, the woman who is the mother of Bruce Vercheres’ twins. Bruce Vercheres of course was then Prime Minister Brian Mulroney’s blind trust manager and Arthur Hailey’s tax attorney.

Arthur- as he insisted, discussed at length the inspiration behind the story of his last novel “Detective”. I’ll spare you the details and cut right to the chase, Hailey was inspired by private conversations about Brian Mulroney and the psycho analysis he and Vercheres would entertain over drinks late at night at Mulroney’s expense. Arthur claims that Vercheres told him that he had received monies in trust from Airbus for the benefit of Brian Mulroney while the latter was still Prime Minister of Canada. Hailey contacted me when he somehow found out that I had filed a complaint with the RCMP claiming that Mulroney’s funds had been deposited with a few Isle of Man entities.

There was talk of a Federal Tax Judge- no names were uttered, Vercheres seemed to have lost all credibility with Canada’s tax court, his practice was floundering and Hailey had no clue that Vercheres had impregnated his daughter, the Vercheres’ former baby sitter…

In 1992 we were advised by personnel of the Registrar of Companies in the Isle of Man that Mulroney has received funds through Isle of Man entities. I dismiss the information although there was some funds deposited by Vercheres in an entity that suspects in my clients’ case had also invested in, a company involved in the development of condominium projects in Telluride Colorado where eventually, Vercheres would own property and rights in the project although, at the time, Vercheres had no significant disposable income to invest into such project. Hailey was solicited with investment propositions and he claimed that condos in Colorado were one project where he could bring back state side, part of his earnings from the sale of his novels and residual rights.

At the time of the conversations I had with Hailey, Alban Garon was alive and well, Vercheres had killed himself with two shots to the head in his Montreal home on a glorious weekend morning. I asked Hailey how the story of a serial killer- delivery man that preyed on elderly people had anything to do with his impression of Brian Mulroney and his criminal relationship with Vercheres. I just couldn’t bridge the business relationship between Vercheres and Mulroney with the brutal and senseless killings of some religion afflicted delivery man.

He answered that he feared that this is how Brian Mulroney would meet his fate. I asked him to think about what led him to believe that Mulroney would be killed and once he rationalized his thoughts, if he still conceived that this was a strong possibility, he should advise the Canadian authorities.

He shot back that the only one he would mention that to would be me because I would understand the financial structures and what the risks meant to the Vercheres and Mulroneys…

Eventually the calls would stop and one day I read that Arthur Hailey had died.

Later, I would read about the Garons Beniskos murders, how the murders seemed to be staged from Hailey’s novel detective. Calls would again come from individuals that claimed that they had information. Garon’s role in tax issues involving the Vercheres at Mulroney’s insistences.

I listened, I paid out of my own pocket for an investigation into the allegations I had received and we believe we have at least one of the suspects.

Then I decided that if Prime Minister Harper can ignore the case and withhold information from the investigators, I would do the same.

Answers for the Garon murders are in files in the PMO, safely tucked away to protect Brian Mulroney- Jack Layton’s new found friend.

The Fifth Estate consequences and the murder of Justice Alban Garon

2011-05-19T15:17:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat

Toronto, Ontario

dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Mr. Lapointe,

I don't intend to apologize because I participated in a public forum, nor do I believe that what I wrote/said could be construed as inappropriate. This said, I will concede that it was certainly unexpected on your part.

Let me be brief here. I am a financial crime investigator. I was retained by Board members of a Canadian public company that lost three hundred and forty million dollars.

That case wedged into the infamous Airbus case that you have certainly heard of. The RCMP gave me a file with evidence that pertained to kickbacks paid to Brian Mulroney, that I was asked to give to your Fifth Estate news magazine.

In that file was evidence of Isle of Man entities that were used by Mulroney's then trustee that the Fifth Estate- we assume, purposely ignored. Instead they continued promoting the allegations that Karlheinz Schreiber had paid or otherwise caused for the payments of kickbacks in the Airbus sale to Air Canada when in fact, it was one Engelbert SChreiber that had handled the transactions on behalf of Airbus Industries and Brian Mulroney.

In the run up to the Oliphant Commission, tempers flared amongts the group of individuals that had a vested interest in suppressing any evidence in the Airbus case. As a result some of these individuals have reacted to extremes by assassinating a federal Chief Justice of the tax court, Justice Alban Garon.

I can tell you this, my group and I have a suspect and we believe that the DNA obtained through our investigation will match the samples recovered at the scene of the Garon murders in June of 2007. We believe that the CBC and the Fifth Estate, through the position they had chose to wrongfully take a stand on has been a contributing factor in the assassinations of June the 28th of 2007.

If the Fifth Estate producers and journalists would have truthfully produced the Airbus story as oppose to deflecting any suspicions through surreptitious means and innuendos in order to shield themselves from potential liabilities, perhaps today, Justice Garon, his wife and their neighbor would be alive.

That you might be miffed at what you perceive to be a disturbance is highly irrelevant.

Keep Twitting or not, I will keep reminding you and the CBC of your lack of honesty and integrity as a journalistic organization.

Daniel M. Deilgat.

The road that led to Airbus, Karlheinz and Engellbert Schreiber.

2011-05-07T13:49:00.027-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat.

Toronto, Ontario

dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Let’s get something on the table right off the hop, I have a criminal record. In my profession that’s the equivalent of a University degree, and although it wasn’t planned that way, my involvement in various cases inevitably led to circumstances where and when I had to break the law. Most of my friends now don’t know this and that might come as a shock to them. The last thing people would suspect of me is that I am a criminal, the reason why it will surprise them is because I am not a criminal but the crimes attributed to me on the public record are, somewhat justifiable from the enforcement community’s point of vue.

Another point of contention is that I am somewhat of a conspiracy theorist, that is a mis conception that can only be attributed to the fact that I was involved in circumstances that for most, are unbelievable to say the least. I believe that Osama Bin Laden is dead and the most overwhelming desire I got out of the news came in the form of regret. I wish I would have been the one that double tapped the piece of S@#$%^&* but I was busy. Again, for those who had various discussions with me over the years, they would know that from the Kennedy murder on, I draw the line at the fact that it happened and if for some reason governments fooled us- and they do that often I’ve been involved in a few instances, we will eventually find out. I don’t believe that W. Bush stole the election and I don’t believe that the terror attacks in New York and Washington DC were an inside job. I have worked for many years on the 9/11 case and I can tell you that the American and British governments have hidden some facts out of self preservation and to avoid liability and embarassement through legal actions, but they haven’t killed their own cictizens. This said, I communicated with then Director of the CIA George Tenet during our phase of the 9/11 investigation and I can tell you this, he didn’t disagree with me.

Now, before I get on with the two Schreibers and the Airbus case, I need to clarify who I am, where I came from and why you should take stock in what I write. I will never confirm or deny any involvement in any cases whereas any agencies of the Canadian or American government were involved. I am an independent advisor and my work took place behind the scenes, my job was to get information for guidance and not legal actions and/or prosecution. My career always centered around criminal investigations, I specialized in securities matters- stock markets and public companies. This is a business where huge amounts of money move in waves and the currents this creates are often a cause for concern for governments. I have had country clients in the middle-east through various law firms around the world, in one case Kuwait hired me to overlook surreptitiously, the investigation of Kroll International into the assets of Saddam Hussein. Kroll found about forty million dollars that was politically clean.

Here is an abbreviated list of circumstances I was involved in.

I was retained by certain directors of the Board of Allied Cellular Systems Ltd to find funds that they believed management had stolen from the treasury of the company. At the time Allied was Chaired by Michael Edward Marcovsky a cable business operator and shady consultant that had worked for Playboy Enterprises when he was younger, hwoever, in his fifties, Marcovsky penchant for eighteen year old women never faded….

Marcovsky wasn’t the brains behind Allied, in fact, he was to the brains what an anus is to the digestive system. Lee Lovett was the man behind Allied and Douglas Casey knew that all along. In its IPO Allied claimed that Marcovsky was essential to developing opportunities when in fact, Allied financed a series of cellular systems that had been illegally acquired by Lovett. Lovett having signed a consent decree with the SEC had to liquidate his assets but at the time the systems were worthless until they were build and operational and that is where Allied became necessary. The Marcovsky, Lovett and Casey trio set out to form a public company and raise cash to develop Lovett’s cellular systems, never mentioning any of this in the IPO- Initial Prospectus Offering. Allied acquired a share of the business which Lovett was quick to dilute into a partnership where Allied lost all of it to Isle of Man entities. The reason why the funds went to the Isle of Man was because Lovett had agreed with the Security and Exchange Commission that he would never again be involved in a public company and that he had sold his assets to Allied. Lovett had lied to the SEC and Marcovsky and Casey lied to the poor saps that bought Allied’s stock.

Michael E. Marcovsky, Former Chairman and CEO of Allied Cellular Systems Ltd.

In the first year of the investigation the Board members claimed that eleven million dollars was missing, we found that in fact three hundred and forty million dollars had been stolen and transferred to various entities in the Isle of Man. I had long wondered why the Board was only looking for eleven million dollars when it was so easy to figure out that Allied had assets north of three hundred and fifty million. Of course Board members weren’t interested in proving that they had been duped or that they should have known. I had to assume that the original Board members could be in on the whole scam.

In part these board members were, Michael Marcovsky, Charles V. Bush, Douglas Casey and his wife Auncha Van Eden, Robert Dickensen- a former CIA operative, and his partner in Taseko mines Robert Hunter the Chairman of Taseko Mines. There was a prominent Canadian architect, of Waisman, Dewar Grout, Al Waisman that designed buildings for NASA and Michael E. Kassan an American lawyer who’s clients included the likes of Billionaires Kirk Kerkorian and Gustavo Cisneros. Kassan eventually became President of a giant communication conglomerate whom fired him after I had a chance to talk with some Board members.

Charlves V. Bush, Allied’s Secretary Treasurer was also a former intelligence officer, Bush was also a Director and the spin accountant that made everything look nice…

An investigative committee - stacked with individuals hand picked by Allied’s management, eventually realized that the management couldn’t beat the allegations we had brought as a result of our investigation and therefore, they moved the headquarters of Allied from Vancouver British Columbia, to the Bermudas.

It was shortly thereafter that I suggested to provide the file to the RCMP here in Canada as it was obvious that this was now a criminal matter, my job was soon over, now I had to deal with the shareholders’ lawyer in Vancouver, George E.H. Cadman Q.C.

I knew that Cadman had been compromised by Allied’s American counsel, Terry Christensen. Terry leaned heavy on Cadman’s firm Boughton, Petersen, Yang and Anderson.

George E.H. Cadman QC.

The fact that Christensen was Kirk Kekorian’s long time attorney and confidante, was enough to convince Cadman that he should play ball with the big guys. Christensen made Cadman Chairman of a loose association of International lawyers where it is alleged that Cadman made a boat load of money. When Cadman was dragging his feet trying to serve Marcovsky in the States, I found the Chairman of Allied at eleven one morning, by seven O’clock that evening several I had assemble a group of New York City’s finest and we had served Marcovsky with the court papers that Cadman had for almost a year. Cadman once warned me that Allied’s lawyers were gunning for me, he had no idea just exactly what was going to happen to him in time. Read here: http://www.google.ca/search?q=Cadman%2C+Terry+Christensen&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Douglas R. Casey former Vice President and Director of Allied.

Douglas R. Casey- as seen above, is a New York Times Best seller author, he writes mostly about financial investments and commodities such as gold. Casey collaborated with us in the early developments of the case and his insight enabled us to lay the preliminary ground work for our investigation. In fact Casey was one of the key individuals responsible for bringing Allied public and, as we found out in discussions with him, he was the former best friend of the true beneficial interested party behind Allied, a man named Lee Gilson Lovett, a convicted felon in the United States that wasn’t allowed to be an officer or a Director of any public corporation.

Casey’s family played a privileged role in the history of the United States. His father was an advisor to President Roosevelt and his step mother was a permanent fixture on the social and philanthropist scene in Washington DC. Doug eventually became uncomfortable with our collaborative agreement, he was of the opinion that the individuals behind Allied and Lovett would set out to get him, and he might have been right. He said on many occasions that he was concerned that Lovett and Marcovsky’s allies might try to ruin him. His concerned seemed genuine and we later had to analyze the threat when a bomb was found in the trunk of his stepmother’s car. But Doug Casey was no innocent flower, a registered arms dealer, he was a somewhat prominent member of the Church of Scientology. His eccentric lifestyle raised eyebrows and concerns that his friends would best justified by blaming his intellectual conflicts but in the end, Casey’s lifestyle raised more questions than it answered. Some statements accredited to him, include comments where he had been quoted as saying that some of the best investment oppurtunities are present in countries and cities where blood runs in the streets…

Casey was evasive about his past. He claimed that he met Lovett while working in the insurance industry, however historical research put Lovett as a CIA operative at the times where Casey claimed he befriended Lovett. What further compounded static facts of our conjecture was that Casey was CEO of a public company that specialized in distributing products such as weapons , portable helicopters and security service hardware. When you asked Casey about his company he would say that the company was mostly a vitamin distribution company… Nobody believed him and that included an enforcement officer of the British Columbia Securities Commission, Gerry Halischuck.

Casey had other hobbies and interests that flew in the face of conventionality and in the end, it was clear that whom ever Casey was, his life style didn’t mesh with his insatiable capitalistic appetite. Making money was most important for Casey, more than kids and family, yet his lifestyle was that of a Wealthy Gypsy with properties around the world. He has friends such as Michael Milliken the former Junk Bond. His newsletter boasted some thirty thousand or so readers every month at five hundred dollars a pop per year. People that followed Casey’s investments advice didn’t always make money in a time frame that they expected however, in time Casey’s advice proved highly profitable if, you had the luxury to leave your money wherever he suggested for an undetermined amount of time best calculate by tens of years. For example all through the late eighties and early to mid-nineties, Casey was bullish on gold when the precious metal wasn’t moving. Today off course, gold is at historical highs and every time I see the price of gold, I think of Doug. He would tell you today that if you had listened to him you’d now be a rich investor…

Casey often had investments in the companies that he promoted in his newsletter, many of his friends equally relied on Doug to promote their small cap ventures to his readers, Adnan Kashoogi a renown international Arab arms dealer was a patron of Doug’s and as it turned out, there were others just as perplexing as Kashogi, that’s how Doug made money.

Casey’s personality and lifestyle was an eccentricity primer for me, perhaps a warning for what was ahead in the investigation.

The minority shareholders of Allied filed a petition with the British Columbia courts and independently, in September of 1994, I filed a complaint with the RCMP alleging that a theft of three hundred and forty million dollars had occurred.

Throughout the investigation into the circumstances that involved my client I had followed the money the best we could. One company that my client owned was a small cable network by the name of Nostalgia Network, based in Alexandria Virginia, just outside of Washington DC. Nostalgia was a nasdaq small cap listed on the pink slips. Allied had lent money to Nostalgia through Allied’s CEO Michael Marcovsky. Both Marcovsky and Charles V. Bush- Allied’s Secretary Treasurer, were also officers of Nostalgia, resctively CEO and President.

Charles V. Bush Treasurer of Allied and President of Nostalgia Network

One day I got a call from Nostalgia’s in house counsel, Daniel C. Holdgreiwe, he had been referred to me by a Wall Street Journal journalist, Mark Robichaux who had been writing a story about Marcovsky, and his attorney and partner Michael E. Kassan.

Mark Robichaux of the Wall Street Journal

Michael E. Kassan.

I discussed with Holdgreiwe the various suitors that were trying to take over Nostalgia, more precisely I asked him if he knew who was behind which companies. On the one hand there was Marcovsky that wanted to buy out Concept Communications, the second biggest shareholder in Nostalgia and then, there was Family Network of the Pat Robertson fame- the tele-evangelist, that was bidding and then there was a nebulous company based out of Luxembourg called Tiger Communication, a company that no one seemed to know anything about.

I looked into Tiger and after a few days, we concluded that Tiger was funded quietly by Kirk Kerkorian, the American billionaire that owned MGM Casinos and MGM studios.

Kirk Kerkorian Terry Christensen

What I didn’t know at the time was that Robichaux of the Wall Street Journal was writing an expose about how Michael E. Kassan and Michael E. Marcovsky got caught stealing more than a million dollars from Christensen’s client, South American Billionaire, Gustavo Cisneros.

Gustavo Cisneros.

You see, Allied’s American attorneys were attorneys at the firm of Terry Christensen. Michael Kassan was of Counsel to Christensen’s firm and Cisneros and Kerkorian were clients of Christensen’s. Nostalgia network was a target of a hostile take over because Marcovsky and Kassan had stolen in excess of one million dollars from El Polo Loco, a restaurant chain then owned by Cisneros, and Christensen was trying to get the money back by forcing Marcovsky out of Nostalgia. He did that by using Kerkorian as a private financier to support Tiger’s bid for Nostalgia. Tiger never intended to buy Nostalgia, the goal was to get Pat Robertson and Family network to up their bid for the network.

I told Holdgreiwe who was behind Tiger and I said that the favor should be returned if I ever call again. Weeks went by until one day, a Washington DC attorney called to tell me I was a flake, telling me that you don’t fuck with the likes of Kerkorian and company, several times he had asked who the fuck I was-that’s a quote.

It wasn’t until a few days later that I realized what had happened. Holdgreiwe had left me a message at home thanking me for the Tiger information, he announced that Tiger had withdrawn in light of the SEC’s eventual investigation into the circumstances, so did Family and, Concept had gained control of Nostalgia. http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHtmlSection1?SectionID=890048-18222-35682&SessionID=9jvIHe-yRP14OA7

Concept Communications was being played into loosing the company they had fought so long to build and finance by helping Marcovsky, but it was now over.

By that time Robichaux had written his story about Marcovsky and Kassan, I was surprise to read it on the first page.

I had kicked Kerkorian’s lawyer’s ass. Years later, Christensen would be found guilty of illegal wiretaps in Kerkorian’s divorce case with Lisa Bonder, and he was sentenced to jail. However I didn’t follow the case and I have no clue if Christensen has gone to jail.

For his part, Marcovsky re-paid Cisneros through Christensen while Kassan apparently cried like a baby to be forgiven.

All of this was doing nothing for my client.

There was still the matter that three hundred million dollars had disappeared, we knew it went to companies in the Isle of Man managed by a man called Peter Michael Bond, a former cab driver in England now turned international financier but we knew little else about Bond. If you thought Douglas R. Casey and the others mentioned above were characters, wait until you read this.

Peter Michael Bond reached a deal with the Justice Department in the United States in return for his testimony in a bankruptcy case. According to Timothy L. O’Brien of the New York Times, Bond was granted full immunity that was comparable to that of the President of the United States in return for his testimony in a five hundred thousand dollars case… Yeah.

Turns out that Peter Michael Bond was working for a subsidiary of Riggs Bank, the same bank that had been found guilty of laundering money for terror organizations by an investigative committee of the Senate of the United States of America, roughly nine years after we had advised the RCMP. But Bond’s career didn’t end there, he had also been involved in the day to day transfers of funds from Russia’s Bank Menatep and Yukos Oil to tax havens around the world. Bond and his partner worked directly for Mikhail Khodorkovsky the Chairman of Bank Menatep and Yukos Oil seen below.

Mikhail Khodorkovsky CEO of Yukos Oil and Bank Menatep

Now remember this, in 1994 I had file a complaint with the RCMP in Vancouver, in that complaint I had named Peter Michael Bond as the central figure that had received the lion’s share of my client’s three hundred and forty million dollars, ten years later Bond gets a deal from the Justice department guaranteeing that he will never be prosecuted in the United States for any crime whatsoever he might have committed, then it is discovered that not only was he working for the same banking conglomerate that had been found to have laundered money for Al Qaeda and others, he was in the middle of Russia’s biggest financial scandal and was named interim President of Yukos Oil after Khodorkovsky had been jailed by President Putin, not bad for a cab driver…

It was back in 1992 when I investigated the role of Peter Bond in my client’s case, that I was advised by Government officials in the Isle of Man that Prime Minister Brian Mulroney had investments also held by Peter Bond in the same entities that my client’s money was in. Small world…

From 1995 to 2001 I had initiated a campaign where I solicited, amongst others, the Prime Minister of Canada-The right Hon. Jean Chretien, to call for a public inquiry into the role of the RCMP in my client’s case. The allegations at the time were that the RCMP had failed to investigate my client’s case because somehow, they knew that kickbacks paid to Mulroney had made their way to companies in the Isle of Man that were also used to conceal the proceeds of the sale of my client’s assets.

Moreover, I had discussed the circumstances directly with Peter German a lead investigator of the RCMP in the Airbus case.

Jean Chretien had been thoroughly briefed on the Airbus/Peter Bond role and the relationship with my client’s case as Prime Minister and, when Chretien left office, one of his first case as a private consultant, was to travel to Russia and meet with President Putin as a representative of Khodorkovsky’s legal team. It was suggested that Chretien was tapped by Khodorkovsky’s Toronto Attorney, Robert Amsterdam,

Robert Amsterdam

a small time political operator whom over the years has represented various companies in South America and elsewhere . Amsterdam was Khodorkovsky’s fierce defender, he maintained a website advertizing that his client was innocent...

President Putin sent Chretien back home and Putin remained in jail, but that never took away the impression of betrayal my client felt when we learned that Chretien was in a position to use private information that we had provided to him as Prime Minister of Canada when we solicited his help in calling for a Royal Commission to investigate the role of the RCMP in the Allied/Airbus case.

By then we had long been told by witness’ that Engelbert Schreiber played a key role in the Airbus case by handling funds identified as commissions earmarked for delivery to Brian Mulroney from Airbus Industries, at a later date. However, there was no public record of it until Lucy Komisar and UPI published an article about Saddam Hussein’s money trail and the links to financial links with terror organizations such as Al Qaeda. Read it here: http://thekomisarscoop.com/2004/06/saddam%E2%80%99s-secret-money-laundering-trail/

Lucy Komisar.

And finally on the Airbus case.

Even the Airbus case is full of individuals bigger than life and I don’t mean Brian Mulroney. But more striking in the recent developments is the position took by Prime Minister Harper. Harper tried his best to distance his government from the whole mess. He advised his caucus to stay away from Mulroney in an unprecedented news conference. Never in Canadian history has a sitting Prime Minister publicly banned his caucus from any contact with a former Prime Minister of Canada. Mulroney was the plague that could have decimated his party because of Mulroney’s ties to terror financiers, and Harper acted swiftly and decisively. But it didn’t end there, Harper warned his cabinet long before about me, in fact you would be hard pressed to find a member of Parliament that doesn’t know about me. When Harper was told that I was working indirectly for a major campaign contributor supporting The Hon. Peter Van Loan, the then Minister of Public Safety was shuffled out of the way read here: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/toews-moves-to-public-safety-82142497.html

To this day I’m not sure if Van Loan even knows what hit him, or that I had done it on purpose to test Harper’s resolve.

The Hon. Peter Van Loan.

All of this was the result of claims I had promoted with members of the Ethics Committee that explored the Schreiber Mulroney dealings and, communication I had with counsel for the Oliphant Commission. The Ethics Committee members were the first to explore the claims that all along, the RCMP, the CBC’s Harvey Cashore and Stevie Cameron had the wrong Schreiber. Pat Martin,

Pat Martin, the day he asked about Engelbert Schreiber on the record.

Harvey Cashore of The Fifth Estate

Stevie Cameron Author and Journalist

the NDP Member from Winnipeg Center was the first to ask Karlheinz Schreiber’s accountant about Engelbert Schreiber. When Martin had asked the question he was already aware of allegations that Engelbert Schreiber and his son

Engelbert Schreiber Jr.

were being sued in New York for his role in the financing of the terror attacks of 2001. Read here: http://cryptome.org/oneill-v-iraq.htm

When Giorgio Pelosi admitted to his relationship with the other Schreibers, the committee surprisingly, decided not to pursue the matter in the current forum.

That is how the Airbus investigation died. Read the testimony of Pelosi here: http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=3282396&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=39&Ses=2

Giorgio Pelosi

The government of Stephen Harper and the Ethics Committee walked away from the facts and, in his most daring and desperate attempt at concealing the facts, Stephen Harper appointed Dr. David Johnston as Canada’s Governor General,

The Right Hon. David Johnston, Governor General of Canada.

in order to silence Johnston through his Oath of Office for his role in defining the terms of reference that Johnston was commissioned to determine by Harper himself. See reports here: http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/index.asp?lang=eng&page=information&sub=publications&doc=ria-rci/table-eng.htm

All of this was precipitated after the RCMP asked me to provide my file in their possession to the CBC’s Fifth Estate producers in 2006. At the request of the officers and after they provided me with a copy of my 1994 file, I gave Harvey Cashore the original copy that was provided to me by the RCMP.

Let me be clear here, my involvement in the Airbus case came about because of what I knew and what the RCMP couldn’t divulge. On my end I was privy to private information that was the propriety of my client and until such time when there was any independent public corroboration of the circumstances I could not, by law, divulge any direct information pertaining to the case at hand.

When the RCMP asked me to give my files to the CBC, I was concerned that the force needed to leak the information and that they were using me to do it.

For those of you that have their doubts about anything I have written since 2006 I will say this, do your research.

Wikileaks, NATO and the Canadian Election.

2011-04-27T16:33:00.003-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

A few weeks ago, shortly after the rit was dropped and Canadians got tossed in the middle of a federal election, several servers from NATO began to hit my blog. As strange as this was, it wasn't the first time that the blog was hit by NATO but, it was the first time that over a period of several days NATO, the US Air Force, the U.S. Army and Navy personnel “ganged surfed” what I had written over the last six years.

I don't know Julian Assange or anyone at Wikileaks nor have I had any dealings whatsoever with the embattled organization however, this isn't necessarily true of NATO, any agencies of the American DoD or Canadian intelligence agencies, and this is where it gets tricky.

By law, I am unable to confirm or deny any involvement I might have had with any governmental agencies in Canada or abroad, directly and/or indirectly either through NATO's chain of command or otherwise.
Furthermore, my public background does not lend any credibility whatsoever to any allegations, suspicions or conjectures whereas I might have worked, collaborated or otherwise acted in concert with any organizations related to either NATO, the Canadian Forces and/or the American Forces. But then again, while some might argue that this is by design, I'll let them speculate on that.

This said, because of public allegations related to terrorism influence within the Harper government that I have promoted for the last two years, both the Canadian and American government had been exchanging information trying to determine where I was coming from, if indeed I had ever done any work for either of them and, finally they tried to determined if I held any classified information that might be deemed detrimental or otherwise would have adverse effects on the national security of Canada and the United States.

I was told a few months ago that both the Canadian and American governments have developed an extensive and comprehensive history of my life and that, after all the information they had gathered through intelligence operations on the ground, they were no further ahead in establishing who I was.

One set of circumstances renders all the information gathered about me inconsequential and as such, to this day, neither the Canadian government or the Americans can quite ascertain who I am, or for that matter who I work for.

The one question that stymied Canadian and American intelligence agencies was how I got to identify the recruiters of the homegrown terrorist cell that planned to attack targets in Toronto and Ottawa, as well as beheading Stephen Harper, The Toronto 18.
The fact that I had identified those individuals on or about the fifteenth of September 2001, a mere four days after the attacks on New York and Washington DC., suggested to them that I had unprecedented access to key information however, they couldn't figure out how I came across such information.

In time the theory that they developed was that, because of my investigation of over seas account and shelf companies involved in the Airbus case, I somehow tracked bank transfers that led me to the individuals that the FBI eventually arrested in New York State in December of 2005, the same individuals whom had allegedly recruited the so called Toronto 18.
That became a problem for the Canadian intelligence agencies when they realized that some of the individual I had tracked through my investigations, had also been involved in the transfers and concealment of kickbacks payments destined for Brian Mulroney, whom by then, was a senior advisor to Stephen Harper.
The Prime Minister did what he could when he realized what had happened and he instructed his caucus to cut any and all ties any of them might have with Brian Mulroney.

Those circumstances generated chatter between Canadian, American and British Intelligence agencies and as a result, concern grew that I might have been the subject in some cables released by Wikileaks. Our suspicions became a concern when a British journalist called inquiring about certain cables that apparently eluded to the circumstances I had been investigating however, it wasn't clear if I was identified by name or otherwise.

When the Canadian elections were called here a few weeks ago, I decided that I was going to take the opportunity to re-address public information pertaining to these circumstances including the 2007 murder of a Canadian Chief Federal Justice of the tax court, Alban Garon, whom we believe was killed as a result of what he knew about the Airbus circumstances and Brian Mulroney's tax accounts.

While I strongly believe that the role Prime Minister Harper played in concealing the Garon investigation should be an election issue, my concern was to protect sources, witness' and the best interests of Canada, by having the issues out in the open at a time when Canadians are more susceptible to listen and read about it. That has developed into a cause for concern amongst NATO allies and the potential effect such revelations might have on the Canadian election, more precisely on the re-election of Stephen Harper's Conservatives.

No one was really worried-to be honest, about the Conservative's chances at being re-elected and in any event, NATO allies had a fall back plan whereas the worst case scenario would be that they would have a Liberal led coalition that would certainly continue and assure discretion of the circumstances encompassed in the Airbus case.
NATO's concerns are legitimate, that a member country might have been leaking information to third parties involved or otherwise affiliated with terror organization and their bankers, was a real security issues for all allies.
Canada and the Harper government complied with NATO's requests of discretion but then, we raised the issues of the murder of Justice Garon and the threats against another federal judge who's son is apparently married to Omar Kadhr's sister.
Suddenly the Harper government could no longer be discreet, they had to kill the Garon murder investigation and tie up any loose ends that could emanate from an investigation into the Airbus circumstances.

After considering the issues at length, I decided to continue addressing the Garon murder issues and the circumstances that led to allegations that Brian Mulroney- then an advisor to Prime Minister Harper, had affiliations with so-called Al Qaeda bankers.
Whether or not Mulroney was aware of that is exactly why the threat is a serious concern. As an advisor to Prime Minister Harper, Mr. Mulroney might have been in a position to be privy to strategic NATO plans and inadvertently discuss what he knew with individuals we know he is affiliated with that have direct ties to terror organizations.
Another more immediate concern and because these so-called terrorism bankers were also involved in the Airbus kickback issues, was that either Mulroney and/or Stephen Harper could be blackmailed
with the Airbus facts that have never yet seen the light of day.

Therefore and because of such potential threats, I deemed it necessary to take the burden off Brian Mulroney and Stephen Harper's shoulder by raising the issue and reducing the likelihood that Canada's Prime Minister would be compromised.

This said, it should be clear that I have acted in the best interests of Canada and perhaps that would explain why the Canadian authorities deemed it in the best interests of the country to let this blog go on for the last five years.

Here are the IP address' of the various NATO servers that have visited my blog pages in the past few days.

26 Apr05:27:10IE 7.0WinXPunknownApo,
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

26 Apr05:27:10IE 7.0WinXPunknown
Apo,
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Switzerland
26 Apr03:58:56IE 8.0Win2003unknownCablecom Gmbh (77.59.199.231) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: The legal incompetence of Canada’s new Governor General led to a triple homicide cover-up; and a job.
www.google.com.sg/

Apo,
19 Apr02:45:37IE 8.0WinXP1280x1024
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
19 Apr02:45:36IE 8.0WinXP1280x1024
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
17 Apr09:23:18Firefox 3.6WinXP1280x1024
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesDrs Technical Services (208.79.15.162) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: April 2011
dandeilgat.blogspot.com/2010_08_01_archive.html

Apo,
17 Apr09:23:16Firefox 3.6WinXP1280x1024
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesDrs Technical Services (208.79.15.162) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: April 2011
dandeilgat.blogspot.com/2010_08_01_archive.html

Apo,
17 Apr09:23:12Firefox 3.6WinXP1280x1024
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesDrs Technical Services (208.79.15.162) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog
dandeilgat.blogspot.com/2010_08_01_archive.html

Apo,
17 Apr09:23:10Firefox 3.6WinXP1280x1024
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesDrs Technical Services (208.79.15.162) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog
dandeilgat.blogspot.com/2010_08_01_archive.html

Apo,
17 Apr09:20:37Firefox 3.6WinXP1280x1024
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesDrs Technical Services (208.79.15.162) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: August 2010
www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCcQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdandeilgat.blogspot.com%2F2010_08_01_archive.html&rct=j&q=nshq%20assasinations&ei=_eiqTaTxEYWg8QOJyYy5Ag&usg=AFQjCNF-dTVpyRPYhMbx0Zks5lgoQuqKjg&sig2=OiH6CcGJmCB4OY36oA52yQ&cad=rja

Apo,
17 Apr09:20:36Firefox 3.6WinXP1280x1024
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesDrs Technical Services (208.79.15.162) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: August 2010
www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCcQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdandeilgat.blogspot.com%2F2010_08_01_archive.html&rct=j&q=nshq%20assasinations&ei=_eiqTaTxEYWg8QOJyYy5Ag&usg=AFQjCNF-dTVpyRPYhMbx0Zks5lgoQuqKjg&sig2=OiH6CcGJmCB4OY36oA52yQ&cad=rja

Apo,
16 Apr11:24:38IE 9.0Win7unknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesStellar Pcs Gmbh (80.92.49.245) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog
dandeilgat.blogspot.com/2010/08/julian-assange-rape-allegations-warning.html

Apo,
16 Apr11:24:34IE 9.0Win7unknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesStellar Pcs Gmbh (80.92.49.245) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog
dandeilgat.blogspot.com/2010/08/julian-assange-rape-allegations-warning.html

Fpo,
16 Apr00:36:46IE 7.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesDod Network Information Center (214.15.218.61) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
uk.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.gx=1&.rand=1q9r1v8tq4t5q

Fpo,
16 Apr00:36:45IE 7.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesDod Network Information Center (214.15.218.61) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
uk.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.gx=1&.rand=1q9r1v8tq4t5q

Apo,
14 Apr12:05:33IE 7.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesUsaf Molesworth (217.33.194.2) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
14 Apr12:05:33IE 7.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesUsaf Molesworth (217.33.194.2) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
14 Apr11:16:45IE 9.0Win7unknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesStellar Pcs Gmbh (80.92.49.245) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
14 Apr11:16:44IE 9.0Win7unknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesStellar Pcs Gmbh (80.92.49.245) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
14 Apr03:48:56IE 7.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesUsaf Molesworth (217.33.194.2) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
14 Apr03:48:56IE 7.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesUsaf Molesworth (217.33.194.2) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
14 Apr03:48:50Firefox 4.0Win7unknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
14 Apr03:48:50Firefox 4.0Win7unknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Isa,
14 Apr03:37:10Firefox 3.6WinXP1024x768
Madinat,
BahrainBahrain Telecommunication Company Leased Lines (77.69.196.166) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
14 Apr03:37:09Firefox 3.6WinXP1024x768
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesBatelco (89.148.63.206) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
14 Apr03:36:40Firefox 3.6WinXP1024x768
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesBatelco (89.148.63.206) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Dolembreux,
13 Apr14:39:59iPhone 0iOSunknown
Liege,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (81.244.103.194) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Dottignies,
13 Apr13:52:41IE 8.0Win7unknown
Hainaut,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (91.178.242.190) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Dottignies,
13 Apr13:52:40IE 8.0Win7unknown
Hainaut,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (91.178.242.190) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

La Louvière,
13 Apr13:01:38IE 9.0Win7unknown
Hainaut,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (91.178.7.157) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

La Louvière,
13 Apr13:01:38IE 9.0Win7unknown
Hainaut,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (91.178.7.157) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

La Louvière,
13 Apr12:41:27IE 7.0WinVista1280x1024
Hainaut,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (91.178.212.127) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

La Louvière,
13 Apr12:41:26IE 7.0WinVista1280x1024
Hainaut,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (91.178.212.127) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Loupoigne,
13 Apr12:01:56iPhone 0iOSunknown
Brabant,
BelgiumProximus Mobile Internet (178.144.85.55) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Loupoigne,
13 Apr12:01:55iPhone 0iOSunknown
Brabant,
BelgiumProximus Mobile Internet (178.144.85.55) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Loupoigne,
13 Apr11:58:35iPhone 0iOSunknown
Brabant,
BelgiumProximus Mobile Internet (178.144.85.55) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Loupoigne,
13 Apr11:58:33iPhone 0iOSunknown
Brabant,
BelgiumProximus Mobile Internet (178.144.85.55) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Leuven,
13 Apr11:42:43iPhone 0iOSunknown
Vlaams-brabant,
BelgiumBase Belgium (188.188.19.38) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Leuven,
13 Apr11:42:42iPhone 0iOSunknown
Vlaams-brabant,
BelgiumBase Belgium (188.188.19.38) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr11:41:27Firefox 3.6WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr11:41:26Firefox 3.6WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Dolembreux,
13 Apr11:34:12iPhone 0iOSunknown
Liege,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (81.244.103.194) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Dolembreux,
13 Apr11:34:11iPhone 0iOSunknown
Liege,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (81.244.103.194) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Dolembreux,
13 Apr11:30:53iPhone 0iOSunknown
Liege,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (81.244.103.194) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Dolembreux,
13 Apr11:30:52iPhone 0iOSunknown
Liege,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (81.244.103.194) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Jemappes,
13 Apr10:44:59IE 8.0Win7unknown
Hainaut,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (87.67.95.22) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Jemappes,
13 Apr10:44:58IE 8.0Win7unknown
Hainaut,
BelgiumBelgacom Skynet (87.67.95.22) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Balzers,
13 Apr10:43:17IE 7.0WinXPunknown
LiechtensteinConnection Pool Adsl Customers Kyberna (88.82.108.10) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Bad Company
www.google.ch/search?q=engelbert schreiber&hl=de&prmd=ivnso&ei=MralTfWiGpGYOp7RhMIJ&start=10&sa=N

Balzers,
13 Apr10:43:17IE 7.0WinXPunknown
LiechtensteinConnection Pool Adsl Customers Kyberna (88.82.108.10) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Bad Company
www.google.ch/search?q=engelbert schreiber&hl=de&prmd=ivnso&ei=MralTfWiGpGYOp7RhMIJ&start=10&sa=N

Apo,
13 Apr10:41:56IE 8.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:41:56IE 8.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:39:35IE 8.0WinVistaunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:39:35IE 8.0WinVistaunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:38:32IE 8.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog
www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=33062795&blogName=Daniel M. Deilgat%27s Blog&publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT&navbarType=BLACK&layoutType=CLASSIC&searchRoot=http%3A%2F%2Fdandeilgat.blogspot.com%2Fsearch&blogLocale=en_CA&homepageUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fdandeilgat.blogspot.com%2F

Apo,
13 Apr10:38:32IE 8.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog
www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=33062795&blogName=Daniel M. Deilgat%27s Blog&publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT&navbarType=BLACK&layoutType=CLASSIC&searchRoot=http%3A%2F%2Fdandeilgat.blogspot.com%2Fsearch&blogLocale=en_CA&homepageUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fdandeilgat.blogspot.com%2F

Apo,
13 Apr10:36:50IE 7.0WinXP1024x768
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesUsaf Molesworth (217.33.194.2) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:36:50IE 7.0WinXP1024x768
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesUsaf Molesworth (217.33.194.2) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:34:38IE 7.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:34:38IE 7.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:34:19IE 8.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:34:18IE 8.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:33:04Firefox 4.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:33:04Firefox 4.0WinXPunknown
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesNato (194.7.138.62) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Apo,
13 Apr10:31:23IE 7.0WinXP1024x768
Armed Forces Europ,
United StatesUsaf Molesworth (217.33.194.2) [Label IP Address]
Daniel M. Deilgat's Blog: Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.
No referring link

Voters; Weapons of Mass Decisions.

2011-04-26T12:05:00.002-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Who would have thought that Barrack Obama would have unseated Hilary Clinton and become President of the United States? Did you even consider such a scenario at the onset of the race for the leadership of the Democratic Party in the U.S?
Most, at the very beginning, would have wagered- some actually did and lost their shirts, that Obama didn't stand a chance, no one saw him as the next President, but then something happened.

There are similarities between the current developments in the Canadian election campaign and the long, outdrawn Presidential race in the United States that merit consideration. The issues have become significantly irrelevant for many voters, instead, the degree of voter indignation dictates for whom many will vote for and, usually, the incumbents receive the brunt of voters' disapproval.

Voter Detonation

Around the world, starting with Egypt recently and now Syria, Libya and Yemen, as well as other micro dictatorships, a current has developed that transcended geographical, political and religious barriers. If we were to “zoom out” of our Canadian election campaign and look at the bigger picture developing around the world, we would notice that a polarization effect is expanding past the usual confines of national borders and religious beliefs.
Around the world, people are disillusioned with their politicians and dictators. Those who have the right to vote, suddenly and abruptly castrated conventional wisdom, they went for inexperience, they voted for blood.

Those that lived their entire lives without the right to vote have taken even greater personal risk, they have risked their lives by demonstrating and opposing the dictatorial leaderships in their respective countries. Many have paid for a better future with their own lives.

People voted against the politicians they know.

It all started when the United States of America elected their first Black President. The election of Barrack Obama resonated around the world, no longer was a white man the most powerful man in the world. As the news of Barrack Obama's election to the most powerful office in the world circulated around the world, people polarized , suddenly everybody wanted to vote, like a teenager driving a car for the first time, people voted and protested their rights' off.

The legacy of those that voted for Obama, little did they suspect, resonated and inspired people around the world. No one was thinking about the impact or the message that the American election would have around the world but in time, the greatest weapon the world has ever seen was unleashed, that weapon is one vote.

Around the world today, governments and dictatorships were sent an international and unanimous message, government must work for people, not against them. As I wrote this today, the president of Russia announced that his government must do more for people, he exclaimed that his government isn't doing enough- the writing is on the wall. No governments is safe anymore, voters have gone global.

All Jack'ed up

Back here in Canada, we are in an election because the Conservatives of Stephen Harper were found in contempt of Parliament- they lied and they obstructed justice, and that's just what you heard.

The electorate hasn't produced a majority government since the Conservatives of Stephen Harper took over from the crooked Liberals. A string of majority government ended with the Liberals of Jean Chretien whom had taken over from the previously corrupt Conservatives of Brian Mulroney whom had received their consecutive majority mandates from the voters whom had been disappointed, disillusioned and almost bankrupted by the Liberals of Pierre Elliot Trudeau.

See a pattern here?

What history has thought us so far

A lesson Canadians took from the last ten to twelve elections in Canada is that bouncing from one scandalous government to another had become an exercise in futility. In time voter turn out dwindled and the reason for that is simple, there are no alternatives in Canada to either a Liberal or Conservative government, that is, apparently, until now.

The developments around the world are present now in every voter's mind here in Canada as we approach voting day. Suddenly voters wonder just how worst can the alternative to either a Liberal or Conservative government really be? After all it was the Liberals of Pierre Elliot Trudeau that had almost bankrupted Canada so, how much worst can an NDP government do?

So, Can Jack Layton and his party govern?

Canadians didn't think so in the past elections but suddenly, and without warning, Jack Layton's popularity surge sent a chill amongst the ranks of Liberals and Conservatives alike. A week an a half before election day, voters in Canada tipped their hand heavily and doubled their support for the NDP, something that has never happened in Canadian history, all of a sudden the NDP and Jack Layton are courted by Canadians voters.
Both the Conservatives and the Liberals suddenly realize that seemingly, for the first time in Canadian history, one of them might not even be leading the opposition...

However, are Canadians willing to elect an NDP government in light of their apathy for the successive Conservatives and Liberals governments? That is still at the unlikely stage but one scenario could have Jack Layton as the leader of the opposition and, if Stephen Harper is right, within a coalition, Jack Layton would become Prime Minister of Canada.

The question here remains, are Canadians voting against Harper, Ignatieff and Duceppe or do they really want Layton to lead?

Lets “zoom out” again and look back at our American neighbors and what has happened with Obama's boldest promise, universal healthcare. Throughout the election campaign Obama made healthcare the central issue of his campaign. Once in office healthcare reform was eventually pass but soon after, in the mid-term elections, Obama's party was defeated and the House and Senate are now controlled by the Republicans. As a result of the mid-terms, many believe that voters voted for Obama simply because they didn't want to vote for McCain and not necessarily for healthcare.

The same could be said of the Conservative's election here in Canada. Voters didn't want the Liberals anymore either however, what is interesting here, only slightly more voters wanted the Conservatives. In fact the Conservatives, for all the money they have, still can't even buy votes to get to a majority.

So what are Canadians voters really telling us?

As unlikely as it seemed only a few weeks ago, Jack Layton was chronically destined for third place again until he told Michael Ignatieff, in front of 4 million viewers, that Canadians don't get a promotion if they don't show up for work That was the turning point for many voters, Layton made sense, it was simple and to the point, Layton seemed unafraid to put people in their place. To voters, that is leadership material and unfortunately for the three musketeers- Harper, Ignatieff and Duceppe, that torpedo against Ignatieff's bow, cause for all three to take in water in the middle of the lake when they can't swim ashore in time for election day.

But in the end, like the Obama campaign, voters are not necessarily voting for the NDP's platform as much as they are voting against the Three Musketeers.

Layton and the NDP happen to be in the right place at the right time, just when Canadians are itching to turf the three musketeers, voters looked around and the only option was Jack Layton. When they heard him talk, they gave him more support than his party has ever dreamed of and now, they want to see if he can run with the ball.

If Layton wants to make any serious in-roads into the heart of voters, because of who he is and the history of his party, he will have to be bold, he must prove to Canadians that the Conservative and Liberal leaders can no longer be trusted implicitly, he will have to do this through actions and not his words.
Layton was never able to do this efficiently while any government was in power, his only window of opportunity was during an election campaign and, until today, Layton never had enough voters listening to him.

Layton needs to decide if he wants to become Prime Minister by default or if he wants to become a leader. It isn't enough to win an election, you need to win over the voters on merit if it is to mean anything.

Jack Layton will have to walk the talk , Canadians don't want to hear that he wants to lead, they want to see that he can.

Can Layton and the NDP use voter disappointment to prove that they are a viable and dependable alternative to the Conservatives and the Liberals?

Unlike President Obama, Jack Layton doesn't have the same brand behind him, however, just like President Obama, Layton worked all his life at serving people, both fought in the trenches believing that they had a shot when no one else gave them the time of day. Both Obama and Layton have the means to say most of the time what they think instead of what should be said and, neither of them had been close enough to power to be corrupted...

Canadians most likely could get a good idea as to how Layton would do by looking south.

Be careful of what you vote for.

2011-04-16T15:04:00.002-04:00

The Daniel M. Deilgat tweets of Saturday the 16th of April, 2011.

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

The following post should not be construed as an acknowledgment of support for any political parties in the current Canadian federal election campaign, in fact, all leaders of the main parties had ample opportunities to address the circumstances over the months and years and, up until these “Tweets” were posted, it was clear that all opposition parties would not raise the issues addressed herein because of their own shortcomings and timely actions.

The reality is that Canadians cannot be told by the various intelligence agencies of the threat the current Conservatives pose to Canadian sovereignty and as such, voters don't know the risks that their votes might bring to the security and integrity of Canadian sovereignty.

Read'em and Tweet

The issue of the relationship between the Garon murders and the Airbus case is not being raised by the opposition parties because they know that they had the opportunity to ask the Prime Minister what his officials knew and,

All three leaders had the opportunity to write to the RCMP and request that the force look into what the Prime Ministers officials knew and when.

Moreover, all leaders knew that there were allegations out there that some of the financiers of the terrorists attacks of 2001 were the same individuals that allegedly handled kickbacks in the Airbus case and,

Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe all had the opportunity and, the responsibility, to address the crisis- Mulroney's proximity and influence with Prime Minister Harper, given Mulroney's involvement with individuals suspected of financing the terror attacks of 2001.

Stephen Harper in his capacity as Prime Minister of Canada had sought the support and advice of Brian Mulroney, a man he knew at the time was suspected of having ties with terrorists organizations,

After the murder of Justice Garon but before before the Pelosi testimony in front of the Ethics committee, Stephen Harper did something that caught everyone by surprise, he publicly stated that he had restricted all members of his caucus from having any contact with Brian Mulroney, a move that surprised even Brian Mulroney, and he called for an inquiry into the relationship between Karlheinz Schreiber and Brian Mulroney.

However, at the time that Harper called for the Royal Commission of inquiry he stated publicly that he saw no need to re-visit the Airbus investigation by the RCMP when in fact he had been advised on several occasions that the RCMP had investigated the wrong Schreiber in the Airbus case

Concurrently, the RCMP and Dr. Johnston also were advised yet it appears that the RCMP haven't discussed the issue with Dr. Johnston nor has Dr. Johnston had seemingly asked the RCMP about it

All party leaders were advised, the RCMP and Dr. Johnston also knew that an independent expert report existed whereas the bankers that had handled the Airbus commissions were now alleged terrorism financiers that stood accused of having played a role in the distribution and concealment of funds earmarked for the individuals that attacked the United States on September the 11th, 2001.

Disturbingly enough, shortly after, Stephen Harper appointed Dr. Johnston as the new Governor General of Canada essentially shielding the academic from public scrutiny.

The reason why the issue has never been challenged is because all members of the official opposition- led at the time by Mr. Dion, had had the opportunity to addressed the issue but they haven't

Instead and in time, they painted themselves into a corner and now none of the leaders can raise the issue without first acknowledging their failures to address the circumstances when they were first apprized of the seriousness of the allegations.

As it currently stands, affiliates of the terrorists that financed the attacks of 2001 in the United States continue to be a threat to Canadian Sovereignty through the knowledge of their role with Brian Mulroney and

His influence on Stephen Harper and to this day, the fact that such circumstances remain secret, Stephen Harper and the Conservative caucus remain vulnerable to the influence of terrorism organizations.

Canada is in a crisis, these circumstances cost my clients in excess of three hundred million dollars when it was discovered that their embezzled funds were pooled in over seas companies that also concealed funds reserved for the Airbus kickbacks that were disbursed to Canadian officials and the RCMP decided to ignore the case.

In time the circumstances escalated, first the financiers of the terrorist attacks in the United States were left unchallenged which created the opportunity to financed the attacks

A retired Chief Justice of the tax court here in Canada was found murdered
And it was discovered that he had been an adviser in circumstances related to the Airbus case whereas Brian Mulroney had allegedly benefited from the efforts.

A second Tax judge's house had been attack shortly after the Garon murders, in what seemingly was a warning.

It would turn out that the judge's son was married to a member of a known terrorism family living here in Canada.

Stephen Harper called an inquiry into the business dealings of Brian Mulroney but he personally advised that the Airbus circumstances should not be re-investigated although He knew that an expert independent report claimed that the individuals behind the Airbus commissions were in fact, not the same individuals that the RCMP had investigated

Dr David Johnston supported the Prime Minister's consideration although he was also aware of the allegation that the RCMP had the wrong Schreiber.

Dr. Johnston was appointed Governor General of Canada by a committee whose members were selected by Mr. Harper and was comprised of some of Brian Mulroney's staunch supporters.

Stephen Harper and his current Conservatives are clearly a liability for Canadian interests and sovereignty and

While this is obvious to Canada's various intelligence agencies, there is nothing they can do to remove a sitting Prime Minister.

The other problem agencies such as the CSE and the RCMP have is that they are committed to secrecy which means that the Canadian voters cannot do their job if they don't know the extent of the issues.

In this upcoming election, Canadians could inadvertently vote for a government that failed to tell Canadians that they were compromised by terrorism supporters through financial contributions

And then went on to conceal that fact by manipulating the process in order to avoid the disclosure of such circumstances.

As such, the next Prime Minister of Canada might be Stephen Harper, a incumbent Prime Minister whose party will remain under aggressive scrutiny by Canada's various intelligence agencies because,

In this case, laws in Canada prevent Canadians voters from knowing what they will really vote for.

The party leaders think that you shouldn't know anything about these circumstances, what do you want?
Read'em and tweet.

The May 2nd Election in Canada: What voters don't want.

2011-04-15T13:23:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

My job is to react to public statements and/or developments that affect or otherwise impact a group of related cases I have been working on for the past few years. That I do so in the middle of an election campaign is consistent with the interpretation of my mandate if only because of certain public claims made by the various leaders of Canada's three main parties. The truth is, the last five years have been one long election campaign interrupted only by a couple of unsuccessful minority Conservative governments.

Speaking of which, when Conservative leader Stephen Harper claims that his party is the party of law and order, I asked why the Prime Minister's Office was instrumental in suppressing the work of RCMP , Ontario Provincial police and Ottawa police investigators in a case whereas a former Federal Chief Justice was murdered.

That this tax judge had an influential role that allegedly had favored Brian Mulroney's interests in the Airbus case was, to borrow on election speak, a game changer.
Brian Mulroney was not only a controversial former Prime Minister of Canada, he was an adviser of current Prime Minister Stephen Harper. As such, that the name of the Prime Minister of Canada's adviser and mentor was being bounced around in an investigation into the murder of a federal Chief Justice was a crisis that would have torpedoed the Harper government into oblivion. As if such concerns weren't enough, allegations arose that individuals involved in the dispersing of illegal kickbacks in the Airbus case were being sued in the United States under the RICO statute- organize crime law, for their alleged roles in the financing of the terrorist attacks that took place in 2001.

When the Ethics committee received the testimony of Giorgio Pelosi- Karlheinz Schreiber's former accountant, Pelosi admitted to a professional relationship with Engelbert Schreiber Sr, and that, had then confirmed an element of affiliation between the Airbus case suspects and individuals whom would later be suspected of having played a role in the attacks of 2001. Ironically, the Pelosi testimony was the only one that was not televised.

I had conveyed that information to the committee at the request of Robert Thibault, a Liberal MP and member of the Ethics committee, soon after hearing of my conversation with Thibault, Mulroney launched a law suit against the member of Parliament after he was tipped by a member of the Conservative government on the Ethics committee. The committee- I am told, considered having me testify in Ottawa but had first settled to ask me for information. Robert Thibault had called me and I will upload Mr. Thibault's message either here or on Youtube in time.

Chief Justice Garon was murdered just as an opposition controlled parliamentary committee- the Ethics Committee, was about to commence an investigation into Brian Mulroney and Karlheinz Schreiber's roles in the Airbus case.

That summer I had wrongly interpreted a threat to potential witness when I advised two investigative journalists to be diligent about their own safety and well being. Frankly, I would have never thought that anyone would rather kill a judge than a journalist but, when you think about it, few people knew about Garon's role and everybody knew Stevie Cameron and Harvey Cashore. Makes sense but more importantly that means that someone thought long and hard about this, that the murders were choreographed so to speak.

What I found out subsequently is that Justice Garon had confided hypothetically that if he was called by the Ethics committee to testify, he would have accepted the committee's invitation because, he hadn't acted in the Airbus circumstances has a judge or a lawyer, but rather as an influential private adviser with Canada's tax court.
Sources implied that Justice Garon had felt betrayed and lied to by individual he held the greatest respect for and that his involvement had become a great source of embarrassment in the legal community, now that the Airbus case was resurfacing again.

Canadian voters would never forgive anyone for withholding such information.

The way I see it is that people would hold me responsible in some way if I didn't bring this up at a time when Canadians have to make a choice. Yet, that I raise the issue alone might be enough to say I told you so but, it offers little comfort for the families that lost their loved ones.

Throughout this election the reoccurring theme so far, has been that our democracy is under attack, that it is broken...

Covering up the murder of a judge is just that, an attack on our democratic system.

The actions of Prime Minister Harper are for him only to answer to however, that Canadians be kept in the dark about such circumstances raises serious concerns about the integrity and commitment of Canadian journalists and the news media apparatus, the ones that Canadians rely on to ask these types of questions.

Canadians don't want what they don't know.

2011-04-14T13:39:00.002-04:00

Private Desk of:
Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Thursday the 14th of April, 2011

Mr. Julian Fantino
7777 Weston Road,
Vaughan, ON L4L 2V5
1-855-FANTINO

Member of the Conservative Party of Canada

Subject: The Chief Justice Alban Garon murder/ your nomination as a Conservative candidate

According to enforcement sources, the Ontario Provincial Police under your leadership, participated in the investigation of the triple homicide that was discovered on or about June 30th of 2007 in the city of Ottawa. The victims were Chief Justice Alban Garon, his wife and a family friend.

Chief Justice Garon was retired, but he had had an influential role in the circumstances related to the infamous Airbus investigations and related circumstances, whereas a former Prime Minister of Canada, The Right Hon. Brian Mulroney, had been suspected of accepting illicit commissions in return for his collaboration in the attempt by Airbus Industries to sell airplanes to Air Canada, at the time when Brian Mulroney was Prime Minister.

Mr. Garon was a life long friend of Mr. Mulroney's initial attorney in the Airbus case.

Again, sources claim that you were intimately involved in the case and that raised some concerns given the result so far of the investigation and especially since you are now a member of the former Conservative government.

During my analysis of the circumstances pertaining to the circumstances addressed herein, a pattern emerge.

1) The murder of Justice Garon happened a few weeks before the Parliament of Canada was set to re-visit the circumstances and allegations related to the Airbus case.
2) Later that year Prime Minister Harper appointed Dr. David Johnston as a special advisor to set the terms of references in an upcoming inquiry.
3) During the study conducted by the ethics committee in parliament, in an un-televised segment, Giorgio Pelosi was asked to testify via satellite and it was during that testimony, that he admitted being affiliated with a known terrorism financier.
4) However what the public didn't readily know, but the members of the committee had been advised of in writing, is that this so called terrorism financier- Engelbert Schreiber Sr., was the actual owner of the founders rights in the companies that allegedly were used to pay the various commissions to Canadian officials in the Airbus case, companies that the RCMP and various media outlets wrongly represented as Karlheinz Schreiber's companies.
5) As a result of developments such as the affiliations of Mr. Pelosi with Engelbert Schreiber SR and their respective role in the Airbus circumstances, whereas serious allegations were brought against the integrity of Brian Mulroney, as a former Prime Minister of Canada, and at the time, a senior advisor to Stephen Harper, the Harper government itself had been compromised and as such Prime Minister Harper clearly advised his caucus to stay away from Brian Mulroney in a desperate effort to protect what Harper perceived to be a threat to the integrity of the Prime Minister's Office. But as we would later see, Dr. Johnston's solution was to ignore altogether the Airbus circumstances investigated by the RCMP.

6) Finally, throughout these developments, the OPP under your leadership collaborated with the RCMP in the Garon case, all the while when there existed complaints that outlined concerns and written allegations whereas the Garon circumstances were allegedly relevant to the Airbus circumstances previously investigated by the RCMP.

As we know, both the Oliphant inquiry and the Garon murder investigation were a great disappointment. In both cases, nothing was resolved however, a striking contrast emerged in time when two key players were presented with prestigious and privileged appointments with the Canadian government and the Harper government.

Dr. Johnston was named Governor General of Canada and you accepted a favorable role in the Harper government.

While Dr. Johnston's appointment cannot be questioned by the electorate in Canada, your position can as you seek the unequivocal approval of voters in your ridding on behalf of the Harper Conservative party. As such, in light of your privilege role in the Garon murder investigation and its alleged proximity to the Airbus case, it is imperative that you and Prime Minister Harper address the favorable circumstances afforded to you, that led to your nomination as a Conservative candidate all the while, given your involvement in a case that had direct bearing on the integrity of Prime Minister Harper's office.

As a former police officer I am convinced that you are as concerned with the murder of a federal judge as you would be with any fatal attacks on any law enforcement officers or anyone else for that matter and that therefore, you would not try or, knowingly, put yourself in a position whereas it could be perceived that you would benefit personally or otherwise advance your career at the expense of such circumstances.

Respectfully,

Daniel M. Deilgat

cc: Michael Iggnatief, Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada
Jack Layton, Leader of The New Democratic Party of Canada
The Right Hon. Stephen Harper, Leader of The New Conservative Party of Canada
Gilles Duceppe, Leader of The Bloc Quebecois,
Elizabeth May, Leader of The Green Party of Canada
Chief Vernon White, The Ottawa Police Service

Lack of options leads to inevitability.

2011-04-08T15:21:00.001-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Years ago I was confronted with a choice to help a friend of mine, by providing her with information that would help her make a decision that she would eventually believe to be necessary and honorable. That friend didn't know who I was- very few people did, other than a carpenter she had met at one of her client's construction project.

I decided to help that friend because I had access to a network of resources that even intelligence agencies can't even dream about. I had a lot of high profile attorneys that were eager to return favors. Back then I was in a privileged position because most of these attorneys' enemies were, well, other lawyers.

A journalist from the Wall Street journal was once questioned about me, by a colleague of his at the New York Times that was trying to establish my credibility, he responded by saying- in part, that I seemed to have had access to high profile, key individuals in the past but that alas, my credibility as to my claims could not be substantiated.

What Mark Robichaux of the Wall Street Journal didn't know, and what I have suspected for years, is that clients of mine, lawyers, acted or otherwise provided information, in cases that I had worked on, that was protected by client/solicitor privileges however, the clients weren't my clients' and accordingly, the lawyers held to the privilege were, lawyers my clients often wanted to get back at or steal clients from.

In a nut shell, I suspect that I was provided with information that somewhere down the line, was protected by the infamous client/ Attorney privilege. The type of information you can't get with a warrant or a court order, the same type of information that judges sometimes come across but that enforcement agencies never get.

So, the next time you think that you are protected by the client/Attorney privilege, think again, lawyers talk to each other, your secrets aren't a liability to your opposition's attorneys.

I decided I was going to help my friend and I abandoned a case whereas I was looking for young girls involved with members of a heroin cartel, that had disappeared in the downtown east side of Vancouver.

For those journalists that read these lines, the RCMP has records of my involvement through the heroin squad of the Vancouver detachment.

My decision to abandon that case was motivated by information I had received from a law firm in Vancouver that all but certified that the girl I was commissioned to find had disappeared and was long presumed dead. While that was certainly not something I wanted to hear, I was told that word came from an attorney of the cartel whom was convinced that he had more to loose by crossing my clients than he did from the cartel. The legend was that she had been fed to the pigs...

By the time the Pickton farm story came out I was well into the case that involved my friend and I had long received information that my friend's case was, in part, linked to circumstances whereas it was alleged that Prime Minister Brian Mulroney had received kickbacks from the sale of airplanes from Airbus Industries to Air Canada.

Coincidentally, a Canadian investigative journalist by the name of Stevie Cameron was commissioned to write a few books about the various Airbus Case related circumstances and, as I would later find out, she was also writing a book about the murders committed by Robert Pickton, the man that allegedly killed fifty prostitutes from the Vancouver downtown east side.

Both the the Airbus and Pickton cases were mired by allegations of incompetence on the part of the RCMP, which in time contributed to the demise of the venerable force's reputation. In both cases, I analyzed circumstances and evidence that to this day, the public hasn't been made privy to and in both cases, a collection of collaborators of mine all concur, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police at best, deliberately ignored evidence that would have led to the prosecution of Brian Mulroney in the Airbus case and that, the RCMP failed to acknowledge that a decision was made at the commanders levels to ignore the disappearance of the Vancouver prostitutes in order to protect the integrity-and the RCMP's investments, of their investigations into various heroin cartels operating in Vancouver.

As if this wasn't troubling enough, looking back now, the only Canadian journalist that documented these two cases in details for public dissemination is Stevie Cameron the same journalist that the RCMP coded as a secret informant.

Some of you might remember that in the Pickton case controversy arose when the forensic lab of the RCMP had mixed up samples of DNA. One claim by RCMP scientists was that DNA of one victim was seemingly found in the tooth of another victim.
Pickton himself was quoted as saying that if he goes down, he wouldn't go down alone...

Some of the Vancouver prostitutes allegedly murdered by Pickton were parties of interests in various investigations by the Vancouver detachment of the RCMP prior to and even after their disappearance. The police already knew about the disappearance and decided not to investigate.

Those women subject of the RCMP investigations are some of the cases that the BC Courts decided not to prosecute Pickton for.

Meanwhile back with the Airbus case, both Stevie Cameron and Harvey Cashore of the CBC's Fifth Estate, pursued the allegations that Mulroney had received kickbacks in the case by promoting for years that the man that had paid these commissions to Mulroney was Karlheinz Schreiber, when in fact the payments were handled by one Engelbert Schreiber Sr, a man sued in the United States under the RICO statutes for having played a key role in the financing of the 9/11 attacks. Coincidentally, Engelbert Schreiber Sr., was a close associate of Giorgio Pelosi, the source of the RCMP, Cameron and Cashore's allegations against Mulroney.

Karlheinz Schreiber himself admitted to a National Post journalist that he was beginning to put the pieces together and he admitted that there are certain things that were troubling him, he wasn't so sure anymore that Mulroney hadn't received illicit kickbacks for his role in the Airbus transaction while he was Prime Minister of Canada. Schreiber and I had communicated since the days after his arrest here in Toronto and I had his lawyer's offices under surveillance.
In June of 2007, the murder of Justice Alban Garon, a former Chief Justice of the Canadian tax court, and Brian Mulroney's attorney's best friend, raised more than just a few eyebrows in the legal community, when various lawyers started piecing together various events that tied Justice Garon to the Airbus defense of Brian Mulroney. Yet, and while the case eventually was handed over to the RCMP, questions were raised as to the abilities and motivations of the RCMP to get to the bottom of the Garon triple murders.

The RCMP has no options left, finding the Garon murderer can only lead back to the Airbus case and Brian Mulroney, a case that the RCMP does not want to become public.

The RCMP caught a break with the erroneous and ill-substantiated allegations proliferated through the years by the journalistic duo of Stevie Cameron and Harvey Cashore, not once as the force made any serious attempts at getting at the truth.

For those of you with doubts lingering, since 2006 I have maintained this blog with my e-mail address clearly printed at the top of every posts I have published. In 5 years, not once has the RCMP inquired about any of the allegations and no one has sent a letter requesting that I cease and desist the publication of the various allegations I have publicized through the years.

The RCMP reads my blog on regular basis, so do a few attorneys at Mulroney's law firm. The privy Council of Canada has downloaded posts on various occasions as well as several members of Parliament.

I'll let you come to terms with your own conclusions.

The Alban Garon murder:

2011-03-23T17:33:00.001-04:00

The circumstances that led to the decision to kill a Federal Judge.

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

In 2006, when I created this blog and began writing about the circumstances in the Airbus case, I mentioned that I have a friend whom is a Canadian judge. In conversations with friends, I confirmed such friendship inadvertently without considering the possibility that my conversations might be compromised.
I never for a moment thought that a distant friendship with a judge might cause others to suspect that I might be on to them and that my source would be a judge they had had dealings with.

I have never met Justice Garon nor have I ever talked to him, never crossed him on the street and I don't believe that I know anyone who knew him.

This said, the thought that Alban Garon, his wife and their neighbor were likely killed as a result of claims I have made over the years that seemingly mirrored circumstances, voir evidence, that Justice Garon might have had intimate knowledge of are coincidental. However, there are public facts surrounding the murders and Justice Garon's proximity to the Airbus case that cannot be ignored, they are as follows:

1) Justice Garon was a life long friend of Maitre Tasse, Brian Mulroney's attorney. The same attorney that represented Brian Mulroney when the letter of request to the Swiss authorities was leaked,

2) Justice Garon's murder came at a time when I warned both Stevie Cameron and Harvey Cashore of the CBC, that I had reasons to believe that some witness' in the Airbus case might be at risk, implying perhaps bodily harm,

3) In private practice, Justice Garon was allegedly referred several cases by Brian Mulroney's law firm- Ogilvy,Renault, cases that pertained to tax issues and whereas Ogilvy had a conflict of interests,

4) Justice Garon was killed as the parliamentary Ethics Committee considered a study of the circumstances in the Airbus case that involved Karlheinz Schreiber and Brian Mulroney,

5) The committee in private focused on some claims made in a book authored by Canadian investigative journalist Stevie Cameron entitled Blue Trust, the story of the trials and tribulations of Brian Mulroney's trustee and tax attorney, Bruce Verchere. The suicide of Bruce Verchere launched acrimonious negotiations between Verchere's widow and Brian Mulroney himself whom was seemingly anxious to get his personal legal files that pertained to his blind trust that covered his personal finances during the period when he was Prime Minister of Canada. However, Lynne Verchere seemingly had the same problems that Brian Mulroney had when it came to the work that her husband had done for the both of them in matters that pertained to their respective taxable income, none of them knew who's money was where and whom paid taxes on what amounts, if any taxes were paid. Lynne Verchere and Brian Mulroney were instantly at odds with each other and in order to resolve the issues, some sort of tax deal with the Canadian authorities would have to be hammered out in order to satisfy Lynne Verchere and in turn, get her to give Mulroney his documents back. The matters were seemingly resolved in time and Lynne Verchere handed over Mulroney's files -according to Stevie Cameron, but during that period, novelist Arthur Hailey had began work on a new novel entitled Detective, a story inspired by circumstances of his association with Bruce Verchere. Hailey was a long time client of Bruce Verchere but their friendship was tested when Bruce Verchere fathered children-twins, with Hailey's youngest daughter and the former babysitter of the Verchere family. Hailey channeled his frustration in a story whereas a biblical serial killer goes around and kills pensioners in an nondescript city in Florida. The murders are seemingly identical in the sense that all victims are elderly, husband and wives bound to chairs with multiple stab wounds, loud music playing in the background.

In the summer of 2007 was when I resume contact with Karlheinz Schreiber. The first issue I raised with him was the fact that, unlike the claims of the Fifth Estate journalists that produce the various Airbus reports and books, he was not the Schreiber that held the founder's rights in the various companies that were involved in dispersing the Airbus commissions. The Schreiber in question was Engelbert Schreiber Sr., a Liechtenstein banker with dubious affiliations that was then being sued by the estate of a former FBI anti-terrorism agent, for his role in transferring or otherwise facilitating the financing of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and other targets in the Washington DC area in 2001.
That Schreiber employed and/or was otherwise affiliated with an individual named Pagani that acted as a trustee for Karlheinz Schreiber in one of the entities involved in the disbursing of the so-called Airbus commissions.
Karlheinz Schreiber instantly realized that his cat and mouse game with the Canadian media was over. He would later give an interview to Allison Hanes of the National Post whereas he would make three distinct claims:

1) "The whole thing is much broader than only Airbus and it starts already at the beginning, in the early '80s, when the situation was that Brian Mulroney intended to become the prime minister and needed help," said Mr. Schreiber,

2) "There are other revelations I intend to make in front of an inquiry which really made me very nervous when I heard about them.

3) "This is something I would like to find out. I am very suspicious in the meantime that things happened I might not even have known about."

Schreiber was stunned, he wrote back warning not to confuse him with Pagani and Kensington. Suddenly Schreiber realized that the claims I made in his lawyer's office on King street four or five years before hand were no longer rants of a lunatic, there was traction and he couldn't deny it, he had been fooled by his accountant and trustees, he could no longer claim that Mulroney was innocent.
Karlheinz Schreiber was afraid now because his case had just landed in the no man's land of National Security. Mulroney, a former Prime Minister of Canada and now an adviser to Prime Minister Harper was directly tied to individuals involved in the sponsoring and financial support of terrorism activities.
By November 14th of 2007 Schreiber pondered that if they can kill a judge he could only assume that they wouldn't hesitate to attack members of his family.
On the day of his actual extradition Schreiber turned to the reporters before he got into the RCMP car and stated that he had to be careful, he had to protect his interests, he couldn't talk anymore.

Schreiber left Canada knowing that he had been played by his partners and Brian Mulroney. He was further disturbed by the fact that the man behind his corporate structures was a man involved in the dispensing and transfer of funds that supported the 9/11 attacks. Suddenly Schreiber realized that when he called in the police on his former accountant he got much more than what he had bargained for, the men behind Pelosi and Pagani had to keep Karlheinz Schreiber on a short leach, they buried him in tax issues in Germany.

In Canada a new Conservative government with Brian Mulroney as an adviser and mentor for the Prime Minister provided the Liechtenstein bankers with more leverage against Mulroney and to a certain extent the Prime Minister himself. It didn't take long for Stephen Harper to realize that the only way to get rid of the Airbus case was to call for an inquiry and control the terms of references.

The inquiry was set, the Airbus case was off limits, Stepehen Harper blamed Dr. Johnston for the terms of references and then he made him Governor General of Canada in case the venerable Doctor ever realize just exactly it was that he had done...

The decision was made to kill Justice Garon once Karlheinz Schreiber could put the pieces together, once they realized that if what I know is combined with what Schreiber knows, Mulroney was going down and along with him the party of Stephen Harper.

On the take journalism:

2011-01-31T11:05:00.002-05:00

The stories of Jock Ferguson, Harvey Cashore and Stevie Cameron and their influence on the Airbus circumstances' outcome.

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

It can easily be argued that the likes of Jock Ferguson, Harvey Cashore and Stevie Cameron did their best and that in spite of their efforts, they came off, way off the mark, factually speaking that is.
Yet when it came to money, they made a killing and, some people such as I, would argue that they made more than they should have and, they did so at the expense of the truth and others being murdered...
Notably, a Federal Chief Justice, his wife and a family friend whom couldn't have been further removed from the Airbus case.

This CBC Fifth Estate trio are some of the most potent and savvy- voir dangerous, journalists in Canadian investigative journalism history. Two of them had law enforcement aspirations and the other was actually a communications officer for Canada most secretive spy agency, the CSE or if you prefer, The Communications Security Establishment.

Jock Ferguson founded the first association of Canadian Investigative journalists and he was tasked to recruit the CBC's Fifth Estate by the German new magazine Der Spiegel, while Harvey Cashore- a law enforcement walking contradiction, who as a kid wanted to become a cop, claims that his boss told him to look into the matters.
As an adult journalist, Cashore would later write that journalists should never, under any circumstances collaborate with any police forces...
Ironically, while working on the Airbus case, he would meet late at night in Toronto hotel rooms with RCMP investigators tasked with the Airbus case.

Two of them- Cameron and Cashore found it necessary, and profitable to write books, four altogether. Stevie Cameron started the ball rolling with “On the Take”, then she wrote a second one with Harvey Cashore, “The Last Amigo”, and then, Stevie Cameron wrote one about Mulroney's trustee and lawyer Bruce Verchere, “Blue Trust”, the story of a lawyer, husband and a father gone rogue.
The Verchere story reads at times like a coded story, the reader was subliminally lead down the pages truly thinking that it would be reveal just how Mulroney had gotten his bribes in the Airbus case -although it never makes such revelations directly, perhaps only seemingly giving the reader an intimate innuendo that doesn't acknowledge anything other than the fact that Bruce Verchere's life was in chaos.

What the book really hints at is that Lynne Verchere- Bruce Verchere's wife, might know exactly how Mulroney got paid. Lets face it, Stevie Cameron had to give something in order for the book to be worth publishing.

Lynne Verchere apparently never told Stevie Cameron, nor as she been summoned by neither the Ethics Committee's study of the Airbus Circumstances or the Oliphant Commission or has she been interviewed by Dr. Johnston, the venerable Waterloo University President- now our Governor-General, that was commissioned by Stephen Harper to advise on the scope of the Oliphant Commission and the necessity to review the Airbus circumstances.

Oddly enough, both the Ethics Committee and the Oliphant Commission lawyers however, called Ms. Cameron to testify...

Stevie Cameron testified that she knows nothing more than we do. However, Stevie Cameron wants us to know that her research is solid, that she is motivated and follows the facts but yet, in the end there is no conclusive results, Mulroney walked and Cameron got a million dollars for her efforts...

All of a sudden, the various accusations leveled by Mulroney and his team that Cameron has nothing more than an ax to grind against him are, to say the least, the most credible allegations brought against anyone so far in the so called Airbus scandal.

Then there is Harvey Cashore, the Fifth Estate producer, an equivalence of a journalistic oxymoron,. Cashore says that a good investigative journalist must talk to everyone, that a journalist should never collaborate with the police and yet, he refused to interview direct sources with first hand knowledge and, he met secretly with the RCMP.
Again, we have the Mulroney team to thank for unearthing that tid bit of information and yet, another journalist's credibility has an out of body experience.

Cashore came up with perhaps the most clever and manipulative title out of the series of books on the Airbus case written between himself and Cameron. His book- the latest in the Airbus case, is entitled “The Truth Shows Up”. A five hundred plus pages manuscript of his whining about how hard it is to be a journalist in Canada, how he was persecuted. Cashore's book like Cameron's “Blue Trust” doesn't tell us anything that we are not already suspecting, that both Cashore and Cameron had no evidence to pursue the story.

In fact it is now at the point where Mulroney is the only one in the matters that has brought any substantial allegations against anyone, more precisely against Cashore and Cameron.

After all these years, the evidence as it stands, tells us that Cameron and Cashore persecuted Brian Mulroney.

Some might speculate that Cashore and Cameron are withholding evidence, whereas therefore one could easily infer that both Cameron and Cashore obstructed justice in the matter or, that they held back their so called evidence for concerns that such information would not pass the rigorous legal and journalistic test of evidence, for the sole purpose of preserving their self serving interests.

Look at it this way, even if Mulroney did get kick backs from the Airbus deal with Air Canada, at this point in time, either way you slice it, Cashore and Cameron acted in contravention of the criminal code whether they either withheld evidence or, if they pursued Mulroney without having any reasonable evidence to do so.

That is where the circumstances seemingly stand however, Cameron and Cashore, together or separately, could have struck an immunity deal with the Canadian government that would in turn prevent any accusations to be brought against them in a court of law under the criminal code in return for their collaboration in the matters. On the other hand, as far as the public can tell, the RCMP has no evidence that Cameron and Cashore withheld any crucial information in the Airbus case that could have established Mulroney's guilt, hence why they closed their investigation of the Airbus scandal.

However, the latter is not probable since the RCMP is well aware of the fact that I provided statements to both Cashore and Cameron and that Cashore had, in his hands for more than ten days, evidence provided to me by the RCMP, from a complaint that I had been instructed to forward to the RCMP in 1994. In fact the RCMP provided me with a copy of my 1994 complaint so that I can forward it, on their advice, to the Fifth Estate and Harvey Cashore.

Which I did in 2006.

We know now that Cameron and Cashore's efforts were fruitless and in 2006, we can only assume that their outlook was just as bad yet, both rejected to investigate the allegations that the RCMP suggested I give to them, why?
One possible explanation is that they have evidence that they did not produce- that they are withholding, which would prove to them that my statements and documents are erroneous or, they are concealing evidence that they conducted a smear campaign against a former Prime Minister of Canada.

As it stands, the latter seems more probable, if you consider this:

-The fact that Karlheinz Schreiber would call the police against his own accountant when he allegedly knew that he himself along with the accountant were conspirators in a scheme to bribe the leader of a nation and according to Schreiber a friend, is stretching logic to say the least..

- Moreover, that Schreiber didn't consider that Pelossi would seek revenge and expose Schreiber's other shortcomings, namely the tax issues and bribes to German officials, is inconsistent with whom Schreiber is or for that matter was, he was a judge in Germany. To assume that Schreiber is that incoherent is amateurish at best.

Really, when was the last time you heard that a drug dealer called the police because one of his clients didn't pay him for his cocaine? It just doesn't make sense unless both Pelossi and Karlheinz Schreiber knew that they hadn't bribed Mulroney and that Schreiber relied on Pelossi' advice on his tax issues and that therefore Schreiber reasonably believed that he hadn't contravene the German tax code.

The story from Cashore is that Schreiber- a former judge in Germany, never considered the risks of his position before involving the police by accusing Pelossi of skimming from the top...

Again it looks pretty good at this point for Mulroney.

Karlheinz Schreiber and Giorgio Pelossi most likely never paid any of the Airbus commissions to Brian Mulroney otherwise, Schreiber would have never dared called the police against his accountant. Yet this is the story that the Fifth Estate has been promoting to Canadians all these years.

On the advice of the RCMP I met with Harvey Cashore at the CBC and I told him that we had witness' in a foreign jurisdiction-government employees, that the RCMP could not interview, that claimed that they were aware of transactions between Airbus Industries and entities use for the benefit of Brian Mulroney. The RCMP sent me copies of my 1994 complaint and I provided Harvey Cashore with the same, in its entirety.

Cashore claims that he checked in the Isle of Man and that there were no entities that coincided with the names of entities he had on file, he presumably abandoned his search without so much as a question as to whom the sources for the information were. Ironically, we could have identified the source within days- still today.

The allegations we have provided to Cashore and Cameron, as well as to members of the Ethics Committee during their study of the Airbus circumstances were consistent, Mulroney got his money directly from Airbus Industries and/or directly from accounts held by Airbus Industries in France. In turn such funds were deposited in Isle of Man entities and then invested, in part, in a construction project in Telluride Colorado, the same place where Bruce Verchere had a condo at a local ski Resort.

In the end, a fact to consider as the evidence stands in the Airbus case is that collectively, Ferguson, Cashore and Cameron perhaps made more money with the sale of Airbus aircraft to Air Canada than Brian Mulroney allegedly has .

The authority of Canada's Prime Ministers: Permissible murders and lies.

2011-01-23T17:08:00.000-05:00

Part One.

In the beginning.

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

The strategy in the beginning was simple, send timely letters to the Prime Minister of the day. First was Jean Chretien who didn't only ignore the allegations, once he retired he made money off of the circumstances by meeting directly with Russian president, Vladimir Putin. Then came Paul Martin whom I deliberately ignore and then, Stephen Harper, perhaps the least savvy and the one with the most to loose. Harper eventually called for a public inquiry and the trap was set, the current prime minister of Canada knew before he called for the inquiry that the allegations that swirled around in the Airbus case were not accurate- as far as the public record was involved, all along the journalists had the wrong Schreiber.

Prime Minister Harper knew that he was in trouble- his staff that is, when I wrote to his office and identified Engelbert Schreiber Sr. To make sure that the PMO had no deniability, I lobbied the Ethics Committee to ask Karheinz Schreiber' accountant about Engelbert Schreiber, and they did.

Turns out that Giorgio Pelosi was sharing offices with Engelbert Schreiber while he was watching Karlheinz Schreiber's expenses in the Airbus case. What Karlheinz Schreiber might not have suspected was that his long time accountant and partner- Pelosi, was actually working for Engelbert Schreiber Sr and that while Karlheinz Schreiber had the administrators rights in the various shells involved, these companies were formed by Engelbert Schreiber Sr's bank and not Karlheinz Schreiber.

Mulroney knew that and he never had any problems denying any involvement with Karlheinz Schreiber in the Airbus case. But who else knew that? The CBC's journalists? Stevie Cameron? Jock Ferguson? The RCMP? Dr. Johnston- our current Governor-General? The Prime Ministers of Canada?

And what about Harvey Cashore, the producer of The Fifth Estate?

For one, Dr. Johnston knew- he had too if he did talk with the RCMP. Chances are he also knew that if the allegations came public Mulroney would be tied to a man- Engelbert Schreiber, accused and being sued in the United States, of arranging for part of the financing of the 9/11 attacks.

It wasn't until the Oliphant Commission published its report on the Mulroney/Schreiber dealings that the PMO started replying to my letters again.

Here is how I got curious and when.

When I first started to look at the circumstances behind the Airbus transactions my motivation was inspired by the fact that the RCMP had refused to investigate a case whereas in excess of three hundred million dollars worth of assets and cash was stolen from the holdings and treasury of my clients' company, that, combined with a statement by an Isle of Man government employee at the Registrar of Companies in 1992-93, that tied Mulroney to the Airbus aircraft purchase by Air Canada.

In fact it was hardly a secret in certain Isle of Man circles that Airbus Industries had bribed the then Canadian Prime Minister.

For that employee of the registrar it was of significance to point out the Mulroney/Airbus circumstances to our investigators because my clients' company's cash shared investments in at least one condo development project in Telluride Colorado that was financed in part by one Peter Michael Bond, an Isle of Man trustee that would later become a protected witness through an agreement reached between the Bush administration, the Justice Department in Washington D.C..

Bond had become a key player in the Yukos Oil/Bank Menatep case whereas Russian authorities had accused the Chairman of Menatep and Yukos oil- Mikhail Khodorkovsky of having diverted in excess of twenty billion dollars worth of assets to Isle of Man entities managed by Bond, in order to avoid disbursing tax on the net income of Bank Menatep and Yukos Oil. Khodorkovsky is currently in jail in Siberia while Peter Bond tends to his garden at home in the Douglas, Isle of Man.

In 1994, I was instructed to file a complaint with the RCMP in Vancouver and by September of that year, the RCMP had received evidence regarding the allegations that three hundred and forty million dollars worth of assets had been sold illicitly and the proceeds transferred or otherwise paid directly to Isle of Man entities controlled or otherwise under the administration of Peter Michael Bond through at least two of his nominee service companies, Fovarrane Limited and Scaan Limited, the same two companies that handled part of the Bank Menatep/Yukos Oil proceeds diverted from Russia.

At the time of our complaint to the RCMP, I was not aware of the Yukos Oil and Bank Menatep circumstances nor had I paid much attention to the statement of that Isle of Man employee in regards to Airbus and Brian Mulroney. What I had done through this complaint however was to clearly identify Peter Michael Bond as the central figure in a scheme to receive, conceal and the re-distribute proceeds of the sale of Allied Cellular's assets.

Little did I know that Peter Michael Bond- a former cab driver, would become one of the world's most prolific money laundering busker, transferring funds through a maze of entities, based in multiple jurisdictions through a select group of international banks such as Riggs Bank and the Royal Bank of Scotland.

In hindsight, in 1994, having identified Peter Michael Bond's network should have been as significant to the RCMP and the FBI as discovering the proverbial Holly Grail but, the RCMP and to a greater extent the FBI, insisted on discrediting and then ignoring the allegations brought forth against Bond and his affiliates in order to protect the likes of Brian Mulroney and the Bush family, clients of Peter Michael Bond.

As a result of the decisions by the FBI and the RCMP brass to ignore the various circumstances, Peter Michael Bond became the center of a convergence of affiliations that transgressed into some of the world's most sensational financial crimes and mass murders.

Bond's money laundering systems attracted individuals with illicit fortunes to hide. Politicians, government agencies, fraudsters, dictators and religious extremists such as the Muslim Brotherhood and to a more conspicuous extent, the Vatican. All had their money with Bond at one point or another and they all shared investments together at various times whether they knew it or not.

Politicians such as Brian Mulroney, George H.W. Bush, Margaret Thatcher and even John Major, provided Bond with the ultimate immunity strategy once Bond could be prove that either one or all of them had had investments at one point or another with less savory individuals such as Saddam Hussein or any prominent members of the Muslim Brotherhood or even Al Qaeda.

Bond knew in 2001, that some of the funding for the 9/11 attacks came from his network and his clients, but he didn't worry about being hauled away, he knew that the United States would provide him with protection from any undue investigations.

A scheme was hatched whereas in return for Bond's testimony in a small fraud case, he would be granted full and complete immunity in the United States for any crimes he might have committed. The deal with the American Justice Department was sponsored by the White House and aids of President Bush in order to prevent Bond from disclosing any information that might establish any direct affiliations between the Bush family investments handled by Bond and Riggs Bank and any associates of the terror group Al Qaeda.

Soon after, Bond's long time partner and interim CEO of Yukos Oil and Bank Menatep, died in an apparent helicopter accident. Conspiracy theories had pegged British Special Forces as having killed Curtis while others suspected Russian operatives under direct orders from then President Putin of killing the British Lawyer, once it was clear that Yukos Oil was, for all intensive purposes, controlled by American interests that involved the Bush family and such advisers as Dr. Henry Kissinger. The latter would later be tapped as co-Chair of the 9/11 commission, only to resign two weeks into his mandate citing a conflict of interests between his private practice clients and his role in the investigation of the 9/11 circumstances.

My investigation of the developments that involved Peter Michael Bond from the time I filed the complaint with the RCMP in 1994 in the Allied Cellular case, kept raising more questions than it answered. For example, in the summer of 2001 I realized that most of the assets controlled by Bond were being liquidated and that the global positions were reverted back to cash while most of the players were either retiring or otherwise cashing in on their loots... I sought to once again contact the RCMP here in Canada in a futile attempt to have the force re-consider their position in the Allied Case.

Sgt. Bennington of the Vancouver detachment of the RCMP decided to take a second look at our allegations and appointed Insp Fozard to conduct the analysis after I had insisted with the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada, then Jean Chretien.

Bennington advised that Fozard was out of the Office until early September, he suggested we have our first meeting on September the 11th of 2001 at nine O'clock.

The meeting never took place, instead Fozard advised that the RCMP had re-aligned its priorities in light of the terrorists attacks in New York and that as such the force had no time for our case.

It wasn't until 2003 when a report from a Senate investigation into the business of Riggs bank and the role of some of its principals established that the bank had laundered money that had actually made its way to some of the individuals that had conducted the 9/11 attacks. What the report had failed to mention is where the money had come from.

Riggs Bank was a subsidiary of Riggs International whom in turn owned Riggs-Valmet, the company Peter Michael Bond worked for until he and a group of managers bought it from Riggs International.

The Bush administration gave Peter Michael Bond his immunity deal once it was clear that the role of Riggs bank in the financing of the 9/11 attacks was going to be exposed publicly.

On the Canadian side, when Jean Chretien retired from politics one of his first trip abroad was to visit with Russian President Vladimir Putin as an adhoc mediator in the case of Yukos Oil and Bank Menatep. He went to Russia to meet with President Putin, with the blessing of then Prime Minister Martin, knowing full well that in Canada, since 1994, his government and the RCMP had suppressed the investigation against Peter Michael Bond by then, the President of Bank Menatep, and the man responsible for dispersing the Yukos Oil and Bank Menatep fortune.

Chretien also knew by that time that Brian Mulroney's former attorney and trustee had investments with Peter Michael Bond, funds received in trust by Verchere from Airbus Industries.

It wasn't lost on President Putin that the RCMP could have acted in a timely manner, that Chretien's government could have been diligent.

Chretien was the wrong man to impress Putin...

The Alban Garon murder

2010-12-22T13:14:00.000-05:00

You be the judge.

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto,Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

The murder of Justice Alban Garon -and the lack of progress in the case after three years, has the renewed attention of several journalists and national media organizations and, even some federal government departments yet, the Ottawa police service has pulled its investigators off the case and re-assigned them. According to one journalist employed by a national news provider, his sources tell him that as far as they know, no investigators are assigned or monitoring the case.

From my end, I understand that the case was handed over to the RCMP from the OPP for two reasons:

1) Alban Garon was a federal judge and that as such the RCMP is better tooled ...and,
2) the Ottawa police is limited by jurisdictional impediments and sophistication.

After digging some more, what I concluded is that the RCMP is avoiding a relationship between the Garon murder and the Airbus case. Alban Garon was the life long friend of Brian Mulroney's first attorney in the Airbus case, Maitre Tasse.
The circumstances implied by this relationship between Garon, Tasse and Mulroney took precedence over the role that Justice Garon had in the infamous de-benching of a judge sitting on a Hells Angels case in Quebec and his ties to Russian students. More to the point, the RCMP have a substantial case against at least two suspects but inexplicably ignore the suspects' potential role in the case of Justice Garon

There are two reasons given as to why the relationship between the murder of the venerable tax judge and the Airbus case had eventually caught the attention of previous investigators, they are as follows:

1) Justice Garon has advised on the tax issues pertaining to the assets of various individuals involved in the Airbus case and,
2) the Ottawa Police Service was provided with leads that identified suspects with means, motives and opportunity.

Because the Airbus investigation involves a former Prime Minister of Canada, namely The Right Honourable Brian Martin Mulroney, the RCMP claimed the Garon case when they realized that the murders could be linked to the Airbus case but, the motives of the RCMP are nebulous at best.

Back in 1997, ten years before Justice Garon was murdered, I wrote to then Deputy Prime Minister Ann Mc Lellan and former Solicitor General of Canada Herb Grey, requesting that the Chretien government call for the appointment of a Royal Commission to investigate the role of the RCMP in the investigation of the Airbus case. The underlying allegations that motivated our request? My clients- shareholders of a Canadian public company had three hundred million dollars worth of assets sold surreptitiously by management of their company whom in turn, caused for the payments from the sale of these assets to be transferred to Isle of Man entities. In the Isle of Man, my client's cash was managed by the same individual that handled the Airbus kickbacks allegedly paid to and for Brian Mulroney and held in trust by both Peter Michael Bond an Isle of Man financier and Bruce Verchere- Mulroney's then trustee and tax attorney.

The RCMP had refused to investigate the case and because of that, my credibility with my clients came into play.

The Chretien government ignored the request and I spent the better part of the following ten years keeping track of various developments related to my client's case and the Airbus matters, dogging at least one death threat against me by some RCMP officers.

After he left office, Prime Minister Chretien was tapped by a Russian industrialist's Toronto lawyer to mediate a case between the Russian government and the jailed Chairman of Bank Menatep and Yukos Oil, Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Allegations swirled that Khodorkovsky had diverted billions of dollars in order to avoid the Russian tax laws and as a result, President Putin jailed Yukos Oil's Chairman.
Chretien met with President Putin and from that point on, we grew suspicious of the intentions of the Chretien government of the past years to cause for the investigation of the role of the RCMP in the Airbus case and my client's case, when Prime Minister Chretien himself participated in an effort to suppress evidence that could expose relationship of international financiers involved directly and/or indirectly in the Airbus case as well as my client's case.

Khodorkovsky's point man in the Isle of Man was no other than Peter Michael Bond, the same individual tapped to hide my client's company's money and, the same individual used by Mulroney's attorney- Bruce Verchere, to conceal the cash payments earmarked for Mulroney himself.

In all three cases- Yukos, Airbus and my client's, funds from the Isle of Man entities managed by Bond were used in part to fund the development of a condominium and ski resort project in Telluride Colorado- where Verchere had also purchased an apartment for his family.

These developments became cause for concern for both the RCMP and the federal government when over a period of ten years, we kept identifying the circumstances before any of it was made public. Letters to then Prime Minister Chretien were often dismissed although the office of the Prime minister would refer us to various governmental departments however, these letters, one by one, identified the individuals such as Peter Michael Bond and allegations that Airbus kickbacks had been laundered through Isle of Man entities. We offered the RCMP an account of independent witness' from the Isle of Man, yet the force never requested any further information. Now, the RCMP and the Canadian government are akin to the proverbial deer caught in the headlights.

From as early as September of 1994 we had identified Peter Michael Bond in a formal complaint lodge with the RCMP's Vancouver Division. By 1997 our investigation had cost more than three million dollars in time and expenses. By then the shareholders could no longer sustain the costs and the stress of such a wide ranging case but, little did I know, it would get even worst.

Since 1997, I have dedicated the majority of my time monitoring the various circumstances. In early 2007, with the help of some friends, we identified a potential risk to certain witness' involved primarily in the Airbus case, I set out to advise two Canadian journalists that we believed could be at risk, they are Harvey Cashore of the CBC's News Magazine “The Fifth Estate” and, former Fifth Estate journalist and investigative journalist Stevie Cameron. While I did talk to Ms Cameron, a message was left with Mr. Cashore.

A few days later, I found out that Justice Garon, his wife and their neighbor were killed in an Ottawa apartment complex.

The untold Airbus story framed in five murders, a suicide and covered up by the Harper government: The Brian Mulroney Legacy.

2010-10-24T15:23:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

In the next few posts I will cover the entire career of Brian Mulroney and his role in the Airbus scandal, the investigation of the murder of an Italian Banker and the death of a Canadian Federal Tax Judge, from the time that he sought the leadership of the former New Conservative Party of Canada. The goal is to catalogue all of the circumstances that led to the purchase of Airbus Aircrafts by Air Canada and, to cover the circumstances that shaped the aftermath of the purchase.

In 2007, Chief Justice of the Federal Tax Court, Justice Alban Garon was found dead in his condominium apartment in Ottawa along with his wife and their neighbor. It is because of these murders and because I believe that the murders are directly related to the Airbus case, that I have decided to continue the investigation of the Airbus circumstances, an investigation I had initially started in 1996 at the request of my clients whom had lost three hundred million dollars at the hands of money launderers that were also involved with Bruce Vercheres, a Montreal attorney that acted as Brian Mulroney’s trustee while the later was Prime Minister of Canada. Bruce Vercheres had received funds that initiated from accounts held in Switzerland by Franz Josef Strauss the Chairman of Airbus Industries at the material times.

The set up
After the death of Justice Alban Garon I advised the Prime Minister of Canada, The Right Hon. Stephen Harper that one of his senior advisors, namely Brian Mulroney, had ties to individuals that by then stood accused in the United States of America of having participated or otherwise facilitated the financing of a terrorist group that had executed the attacks of September the 11th, 2001. In that same letter to the Prime Minister’s Office I advised the Prime Minister that the main subject of the RCMP investigations of the Airbus circumstances, Karlheinz Schreiber, was not the same Schreiber that had indeed received from Airbus Industries funds to be disbursed to Canadian officials as bribes in order to secure the purchase of Airbus Aircrafts. The Schreiber in question was in fact Engelbert Schreiber, a Liechtenstein banker with dubious affiliations with drug lords and other terrorism organizations linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

This meant- as I have represented to a New York journalist, that Prime Minister Harper had within his circle of close advisors, a man with direct ties and common interests with alleged financiers of the 9/11 attacks.

This statement was proportioned to reveal a certain amount of exaggeration from the reader’s perspective however; the statement is true in its entirety. In other words, I knew that very few would take it seriously and that was the idea; tell them the truth in a way that they would option not to believe if only for its extraordinarity.

The trap was set. The office of the Prime Minister took the advice seriously. Combine with the pressure from Karlheinz Schreiber whom alleged that the Prime Minister would grant him a reprieve in his extradition order on the advice of Brian Mulroney at a meeting at the Prime Minister’s retreat near Ottawa, Stephen Harper called for an inquiry into the business dealings between Karlheinz Schreiber and Brian Mulroney. The Prime Minister of Canada sought the advice of Dr. David Johnston- now the Governor General of Canada, to draft the terms of references of the upcoming inquiry however, Stephen Harper specifically called on Johnston not to include the Airbus circumstances and, Dr. Johnston agreed that the investigation of the RCMP into the Airbus circumstances was “well tilled grounds”.

Both men were aware of the fact by then that, the Schreiber that the RCMP had investigated was the wrong Schreiber hence why the venerable federal police force had never found any evidence to support the claims of journalist such as Harvey Cashore of the CBC and Stevie Cameron. Both the CBC Fifth Estate and Stevie Cameron relied on the limited and underfunded expertise of private investigators to conclude that Karlheinz Schreiber was the man that indeed dealt directly with Airbus Industries when in fact it was Engelbert Schreiber.

To assure myself that these circumstances would be identifiable on the public record I wrote to all the members of the Ethics Committee that studied the circumstances that involved Brian Mulroney and Karlheinz Schreiber in the Airbus deal. I wrote to the members that indeed it was Engelbert Schreiber and not Karlheinz Schreiber that dealt with Airbus industries. To support my claim I quoted the Chairman of Kroll Worldwide- a New York investigative firm dubbed as a juggernaut in the world of finance and securities, whereas the latter’s firm had conducted a thorough investigation on the sources of the financing of the 9/11 attacks on behalf of private clients. Jules Kroll was quoted by an American journalist by the name of Lucy Komisar whom has written an expose on the finances of Saddam Hussein and his ties to the Muslim brotherhood.

All but two members of Parliament have ignored my claims at the time. Robert Thibault a Liberal from Nova Scotia had taken the time to call me and inquire further about the allegations however, soon thereafter Brian Mulroney had launched a lawsuit against Thibault, and Pat Martin of the New Democratic Party of Canada- member for Winnipeg-Center, took it one step further, when he questioned Giorgio Pelosi- K. Schreiber’s accountant that handled some of the Airbus kickbacks, he asked if Pelosi knew a man called Engelbert Schreiber to which Pelosi replied that indeed they use to share an office together.

At that time both Prime Minister Harper and David Johnston knew that there was reason to believe that the RCMP’s investigation of the Airbus case was seriously flawed. Dr. David Johnston claims that he had reviewed the statements of the witness’ that had appeared in front of the Ethics committee and still, he maintained that the RCMP’s investigation of the Airbus circumstances was beyond reproach.
Both Prime Minister Harper and Dr. David Johnston had been made aware well in advance of the Pelosi testimony in front of a Parliament Committee that indeed media reports, the Justice Department and the RCMP had the wrong Schreiber yet, both ignore the evidence that was surfacing and both pre-empted the inquiry of Justice Oliphant from reviewing the allegations and the investigation of the RCMP.

As it is now apparent that both the Prime Minister and the newly minted Governor General of Canada conspired to suppress an inquiry into the Airbus circumstances-because of the overwhelming facts that time has afforded us, I am compelled to revisit how and why Brian Mulroney became Prime Minister of Canada and the result of his role in Canada’s history.

During the next few weeks I will explore the murder of Roberto Calvi and the role of Ogilvy Renault, Arthur Campeau, Bruce Vercheres, Brian Mulroney, Franz Josef Strauss and Karlheinz Schreiber, before Mulroney became Prime Minister of Canada, and how the death of an Italian banker propelled Brian Mulroney to the highest office in the land. We will name the man that allegedly paid the killers of Roberto Calvi although our investigation so far leads us to believe that Karlheinz Schreiber was the bag man that picked up the money from the Rothschild bank.

We will trace back a multitude of real estate transactions that ultimately lead back to the Strauss family and the former Chairman of Airbus Industries as well as to Karlheinz Schreiber and Ogilvy, Renault.

Shortly after I will delve into the tax issues of some of these ventures, the proceedings in Canadian tax courts and who the attorneys and judges were.

I will release information pertaining to the murders of Justice Alban Garon, his wife, their neighbor and Roberto Calvi without first advising the authorities unless other citizens are under imminent threat.

In the end, the conclusion will once and for all give all Canadians a true and accurate picture of what the Airbus Scandal really was.

The legal incompetence of Canada’s new Governor General led to a triple homicide cover-up; and a job.

2010-10-02T16:50:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

There are only two times that I received hate mail. Once was after a nasty post about Brian Mulroney and the other was when I wrote about our then soon to be new Governor General, Professor Dr. David Johnston, the man that told us that the RCMP’s investigation of the Airbus circumstances was well tilled ground.

Dr. Johnston was commissioned by the Prime Minister to define the terms of references for the inquiry into the business relationship between Brian Mulroney and Karlheinz Schreiber. In fact, Dr. Johnston had to write two reports for the Prime Minister. One was part of his original mandate and the second was requested by The Prime Minister after revelations that the whole Airbus case might have been financed by a man by the name of Engelbert Schreiber who happens to be a defendant in The United States of America in a civil lawsuit brought by the family of a 9/11 victim, John P. O’Neil, the former head of Security for the World Trade Center.

For those of you that might have missed that tid bit of information, let me explain what happened that led to Giorgio Pelosi- Karlheinz Schreiber’s former accountant, to testify via satellite at the Ethics Committee hearings on the Airbus case to the fact that at the time that Karheinz Schreiber was greasing Canadians, Pelosi- the man that claims to have handled the grease monies paid to then Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, was operating out of the offices of one of the financial master minds behind the 9/11 attacks.

Soon after the hearings began I wrote to all of the members of the Ethics Committee. I advised that both the CBC’s Fifth Estate and Stevie Cameron had their facts wrong. The first allegations was that it was Engelbert Schreiber and not Karlheinz Schreiber that had received the funds from Airbus Industries and, the second allegations was that although the RCMP knew of that relationship and that it involved Brian Mulroney, nobody dared to advise the Prime Minister that one of his most senior advisors- Brian Mulroney, had financial affiliations with suspect terror financiers associated with the 9/11 attacks.

In fact it was months before I first wrote to the Ethics Committee that I had written directly to Prime Minister Harper about the relationship. Within a matter of days Prime Minister Harper called for a public inquiry into the relationship between Karlheinz Schreiber and Brian Mulroney and had issued a public warning to all his caucus members not to have any dealings with Mulroney.

There were two things wrong with Prime Minister Harper’s sudden decision, one came at the announcement and it was that he knew by then that Mulroney’s dealings involved a financial relationship with Engelbert Schreiber a suspected Al-Qaeda financier and that Karlheinz Schreiber was in fact only a middle man and, the second, Prime Minister Harper had reasons to suspect that the RCMP investigation into the Airbus circumstances was flawed and based on inaccurate allegations.
We know that the RCMP relied heavily on information provided by Harvey Cashore of the CBC’s Fifth Estate and Stevie Cameron- herself a former reporter for the Fifth Estate. Both Cashore and Cameron focused on Karlheinz Schreiber’s role in the matters when in fact; the real guarantor in the deal was Engelbert Schreiber. I also advised both the Prime Minister and the Ethics Committee that Aircraft Leasing was actually an Engelbert Schreiber company and that the Founder’s rights were merely transferred to Karlheinz Schreiber for administrative purposes.

Did Stephen Harper lie to distance his government from allegations that he was advised by a former Prime Minister with ties to Al Qaeda financiers? The answer is yes.
Did the Prime Minister manipulate the mandate of Dr. David Johnston to force the exclusion of a review of the RCMP investigation of the Airbus case, again, yes.

That’s pretty bad up to here but it gets darker.

In the period where Justice Oliphant conducted his inquiry into the business dealings between Mulroney and K. Schreiber I was made aware of certain circumstances whereas allegations surfaced that Brian Mulroney- through counsel, had sought tax advice in order to lighten the tax burden of the widow of his former tax attorney and trustee, Bruce Verchere.

Bruce Verchere was the trustee that received the so call Airbus kickbacks on behalf of Brian Mulroney however, soon after Bruce Verchere took his own life Mulroney came calling to claim the files that Bruce Verchere had on the transfers of the Airbus cash and the whereabouts of his money. What Mulroney got was a pissed off widow who claimed that her husband had squandered half of her wealth and that in fact once her taxes were paid she would be left with nothing but the insurance money. Lynne Verchere decided that Mulroney would not make any claims on his Airbus cash- since he had gotten it illicitly and, she decided that Mulroney would get none of it unless he could help with her own tax issues that her husband had created.

Mulroney’s new tax attorney was Justice Alban Garon’s life long friend…

Lynne Verchere was left to pay her taxes and now, seemingly lives in semi-exile in the United States with at least one of her sons. They moved there after the suicide of Bruce Verchere and the publication of a novel that was written by a former client of Bruce Verchere, novelist Arthur Hailey. The book was allegedly to spite Bruce Verchere after the latter had impregnated Hailey’s youngest daughter according to investigative journalists Stevie Cameron.

The story line was about a serial killer- a delivery man that went around killing elderly people in their homes by tying them to chairs and stabbing them repeatedly.

In spite of all of this, Dr. Johnston accepted to become Governor General of Canada has it was offered to him by Prime Minister Harper- at the suggestions of Mulroney loyalists, although he personally knew from the time of his second report of the allegations that the RCMP had the wrong Schreiber, a fact that Karlheinz Schreiber failed to dispute when I questioned him.

Dr. Johnston could not have read any reports by the RCMP and still stand by his conclusions, although he did admit to having done so.

This is not the due diligence that seasoned lawyers would stand behind, it is at best amateurish.

Slide on over and investigate the murder of Justice Garon…

2010-09-18T18:37:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

The first time I ever witnessed a murder, I was twelve years old. Some would argue that the circumstances had no similarities with more typical murders yet, I was never convinced that murders are different. Nor are the witness’. And the guy was dead as a door nail.

Many times since I’ve been a witness to un-timely deaths as a civilian and, I always wondered if there is a number, an average if you will of how many murders/deaths, a regular Joe can witness. I count thirty four in roughly forty seven years… Friends tell me that I’m always at the wrong place at the wrong time and looking back, this is getting creepy.

I was fourteen years old was when I first launched into an investigation into an attempted murder. The victim was my high school sweetheart and the would be “pellet gun hit man” was a kid from school. I found him.

Little did I know that this would become a recurring theme.

I have also worked for some young adults that were accused of killing their child. I believe that they were innocent but in the eyes of the Hamilton police, the Catholic Children Aid Society and St-Joseph hospital, they were Black. A couple of years ago, an M.E. was found guilty here in Toronto of doctoring his diagnosis in murder cases that involved children… Yet the mother was incarcerated and her other child taken away from her by the Children’s Aid Society in circumstances that smack of a legal kidnapping. When I raised questions about the evidence of the Hamilton police and the hospital doctors that had treated Maliek, my conclusion- backed by scientists at Harvard University, was the CAS and the doctors of the hospital had demonstrated unusual incompetence, voir negligence.
That their testimonies would be tainted and self serving.

Nobody listened, including the mother’s attorney who was more inclined to make a deal with the Crown than to get to the truth.

The murders of Justice Garon, his wife and their friend is very similar with the only exception that the police forces involved- the RCMP, the Ottawa police and the OPP really have nobody else handy to accuse…

They pathetically tried to pin the murders on the adopted daughter- I am told, of the Garons, although at the time of the murders she was vacationing with her husband and child in Spain. When that failed, police Chief White- a former RCMP, launched his own “murder he wrote lottery” by asking the police board to re-instate a bounty for any information that would lead to the arrest of the murder or murderers…
The deal went something like, “ let’s re-instate the reward for information and White would pull all investigators from the case in an apparent cost efficient swap.
The board was then left with an accounting decision- typical of the Mounties management current and former, pay a couple of detectives to snoop around for $150,000.00 or yank them- re-assigned was the term, and get them to do something more pressing- God knows what that can be in Ottawa, and pay only when that information will be forthcoming.

The case of Justice Garon was shelved.

A journalist conveyed that the Ottawa police had re-assigned all investigators and that as a result, nobody was working the case, days before I met with OPP officers familiar with the case. When I asked sources at the OPP they claimed that the OPP always keeps a vigilant eye out for any intelligence in the case…

Now what the fuck is that?

Those by the way are not my words, I am quoting an individual that I met a few weeks ago who claims that he left messages with the Ottawa police, the RCMP and the OPP.

That individual decided to contact me after he had a read a series of posts I had written about the Garon murders.
He didn’t want to offer any evidence or any statements, in his words he wanted me to know that I was on the right track…
I told him that I wasn’t investigating the murders as he was walking away, he replied that I will…

That individual was lying to me and I could see that. I listened to him because I am not easy to find and that guy found me like I’m on his GPS. I believe that he knew more about the murders than he would lead on, he avoided names but hinted at the work I did on the Airbus case.

I think the individual is a gay male in his late forties or a woman very well disguised.

The meeting was timed to perfection. We met at the corner of Queen Street and University in Toronto. We walked to the entrance of the Queen subway, at Young and Queen at noon sharp on a Friday afternoon. There, the individual blended in the crowd the time it took me to light a cigarette and turn my back to the wind.

Nothing more.

I realized after, that we had met at the doors of the Federal Tax Court here in Toronto, the irony was professional.

I don’t investigate murders, never again, I think…

Julian Assange rape allegations, a warning by NATO Special Operations.

2010-08-21T14:23:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

NATO Special Operations in the intelligence community has been for years the enemy from within. Ran out of the NSHQ, NATO special operations are to the intelligence world what Lichtenstein is to the money laundering world. When member countries decide to conduct operations such as the attacks that were brought against Julian Assange the editor of Wikileaks, they usually go through NATO Special Ops operatives in order to plausibly deny any involvement.
Over the years I have been in situations where I had to deal with the NSHQ and its agents in various circumstances. There is an old saying about salesmen that I am sure you have heard before; ...the guy would sell his own mother... Well, the best way to describe NSHQ operations staff would be to say that these guys would kill their own mother if they can rationalize that necessity.

The NSHQ is where the best of the worst intel operatives from member countries go. Italians bombed their own citizens in Italy in the 70’s in order to blame a terrorist group and polarize the Italian citizens- in perhaps one of the most daring and ill-planned false flag operation of the NSHQ and its predecessor’s history. They do not concern themselves with subtlety because they are the best at eliminating any ties between the NSHQ and the member country they act for in a particular case. The NSHQ is the one intelligence outfit that knows virtually everything there is to know. They have ties in everything that is illegal and their operatives thrive financially through this access. If you need to know who financed which terrorist group, the NSHQ is where you need to look. If you wonder why and how drug cartels survive in their fight against some of the world’s most organized drug enforcement agencies, there is only one answer, the NSHQ protects them. During the Iran-Contras affair operatives of the NSHQ provided support to Oliver North, the cash that was provided to North’s outfit came from the proceeds of the sale of a new and more addictive street drug, Crack Cocaine.
We- through our involvement in NATO, have created that drug that killed or otherwise afflicted hundreds of thousands of individuals worldwide. We are the ones that brought this product in the streets of our cities and put it within the reach of our own children and, we have the NSHQ and the American government of Ronald Reagan to thank for that.
The Editor-in Chief of Wikileaks has now been marked. The allegations, whether they carry some truth or not- most likely they don’t although the interpretation could lead to a rationalization that would conclude that Assange’s behaviour was unorthodox, are a warning. Somehow, there is more to these documents than meets the proverbial eye. The United State is not worried about the lives of a few informants and they are past the necessity to limit soldier’s casualties. If the Taliban and the other insurgents have suffered massive casualties and operational setbacks, they already have figured out how, where and whom, long before the documents were leaked. Which brings me back to what I had written before and that is that Assange made a mistake by holding back some of the documents, everything should have been leaked at once but it wasn’t. There is only one explanation for that and that is that Assange figured that the intelligence community would play nice with him if he held back the most damning evidence in exchange for his spot in the limelight... Assange was wrong, NATO and its member countries are now in a damage control mode and they want to know now exactly what Assange has in terms of documents and evidence and, they are already considering having Assange killed. But before that can happen they need to know what Assange did with the information and who else has what.

Much like the eleven or so biologists that were killed after the Anthrax attacks in the United States- because they could ascertain where the strains came from, Assange’s prospects are dimming by the hour.

Now considering the fact that Assange and his group of collaborators at Wikileaks are for all intensive purposes dead- figuratively speaking, the only option left for the beleaguered group is to publish everything in order to change the tide and save their own skin, but then again, they would put their self interests ahead of those of soldiers fighting for the Afghans and the Iraqis.

More to the point, doing so would hand a resounding victory to Al Qaeda, The Muslim Brotherhood and, of course, the NSHQ.

Top Secret

2010-08-19T21:42:00.002-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

In 1995, my bank manager conveyed to me his concerns about my personal safety, something along the lines of “Dan aren’t you concerned that these guys will come after you and shoot you?”

As one might imagine, the bank had done their research before they decided to lend me money and in fact, it was unprecedented here in Canada to have a bank lend money to a client to finance parts of a lawsuit. The National Bank of Canada did just that, to the tune of more than a hundred thousand dollars and no, the banker wasn’t threatening me...
Over the years more friends and acquaintances familiar with my involvement in the Allied case, the Airbus case and ultimately the 9/11 attacks case- and some peripheral drug related cases, re-iterated these concerns for some reason...

I always wondered why people could only assume that I was in danger and not the individuals I was up against. Time and again people thought that I should be afraid but never for a minute did anyone ever consider that it might be the other way around.

The Wikileaks War Logs; what we need to know.

2010-08-07T15:05:00.003-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

I read somewhere that the truth is the first casualty of war and that reminded me of the ever ongoing debate about truth and secrets. In the intelligence world truth is protected by secrecy when secrecy is implemented by individuals that must protect their self serving interests. Bluntly put, they keep secrets to cover the asses.
When you think about it, the great battle between secrets and truth affects everyone and everything on this planet and, over the centuries, we have learned and adapted with the reality that there will always be secrets and people will always lie to protect secrets that would expose the truth. But is it in secrets that the truth really hides?
Our quality of life is based on our abilities to expose secret circumstances in order to uncover a given truth to supposedly protect ourselves and, we go on with these battles because we believe that the truth will set us free. But is it discovering the truth that will set us free?
That brings us to the purpose of the release of the War Logs.
Here is what we know about wars and what happens in general terms. We go somewhere and we fight. In a given conflict we will kill people and we will have some of our people killed. There are no police or any other kind of law enforcements in the theatre of war. Basically, anything you can get away with goes.
We saw that when, at the end of the Second World War, the Americans blew up Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The devastation of the atomic bombs was by far, much greater than what the Japanese had done to Pearl Harbour. The Japanese attacked a military base- 2,402 personnel were killed and 1,282 were wounded, in their quest to conquer the world and the Americans bombed two whole cities, citizens and all whereas within the first two to four months of the bombings, the acute effects killed 90,000–166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000–80,000 in Nagasaki. There was no secret about that, Americans destroyed most part of two Japanese cities killing in excess of three hundred thousand civilians that had never been warned of the impeding attack.
No Americans were ever prosecuted for the murder of more than a quarter of a million Japanese citizens in contrast with the Nazi Germans that were hunted down and rightfully prosecuted.
So, I always wondered about the argument that truth is the first casualty of war and how obviously it doesn’t apply to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks because there was no hiding the destruction and yet, the American government got away with it although the truth was there for everyone to see, there was no secret in the destruction of these two cities.
So much for the truth will set us free...
So when I see news headlines such as those generated by The Guardian and The New York Times about the war logs published by Wikileaks, I can’t help but notice the double standards of journalists. You have individuals like the Chairman of Wikileaks that shrouds himself in a cloak of dignity and righteousness when in fact, the absurdity of the claims in the so-called War Logs do nothing but tell us that war is a killing business. Now if you don’t already know that then read the logs but for most people on this planet, this is nothing more than journalists seeking fame.

The first casualty of war is justice and human rights. In any war both sides are to blame and both sides are wrong, that is why they go to war in the first place. We train soldiers to kill in order to keep secret are shortcomings. The notion that we do not kill others in vain is as absurd as it is secret.

My opinion so far, the War Logs is a waste of time unless they prove to us that we are a greater threat to civilization than Al Qaeda is.

Concurrently, Harry S. Truman- the American President that ordered the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, justified the attacks by calculating the amount of casualties that would be incurred by the United States in an all out war with Japan, versus the amount of deaths that the bombings would generate. The conclusion reached by the Allies was that millions of our soldiers would die if such war was to go on. The decision was to annihilate three hundred thousand Japanese citizens to save the lives of at least a million American soldiers.

Truman and Churchill along with the Chinese President were all in agreement that American lives were worth more than Japanese lives. A 1944 opinion poll that asked what should be done with Japan found that 13% of the US public were in favour of the extermination of all Japanese, men women and children. The math would break down as follows: 2,402 Americans Soldiers’ lives = 246,000 Japanese civilian lives therefore, one might infer that American life was worth ten times a Japanese life.
Or as one acquaintance of mine likes to put, the war on terrorism won’t be over until at least three hundred thousand civilian Muslims are killed.

Ironically, Truman’s opinion towards attacking Japanese civilians was not any different than that of Hitler’s views on Jewish lives...

More to the point in the context of the position of Wikileaks' editor-in-Chief and his assertion that he has yet to release all documents in order to protect American lives, we could interpretate his mathematical conclusions as follows: A few American lives are justifiable in comparison with all the others that Al Qaeda plans to kill.

His math is actually more "Hitleresque" than Truman's, which leads me to conclude that as a journalist and editor-in-Chief, Julian Assange is taking sides in the debate, siding with the very individuals that he presumably wants to expose.
Not exactly an example of neutrality.

In the end, Julian Assange is- by the very nature of his decisions, discounting the value of Afghan and non- American civilian lives when he withholds the release of all documents.

So what is it that makes one human less deserving than another under identical circumstances?

That’s what we need to know.

Reid Morden; the right conflict of interest for the job

2010-07-30T19:07:00.001-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

I don’t know much about Mr. Morden but I know this.

Morden worked for Kroll. Kroll advised on the Airbus case for the RCMP and the Federal Government. The RCMP refused to investigate my client’s case because it was tied into the financing of the Airbus case and the attacks of 9/11 whereas a former employee of Kroll and the head of security for the World Trade Center. The estate of John O Neil- the former head of security for the World Trade Center, are suing one Engelbert Schreiber Sr., a man accused of financing the 9/11 attacks and a man that Karlheinz Schreiber’s accountant admitted having shared an office with at the time whereas Pelosi and Karlheinz Schreiber were greasing Brian Mulroney.
But it doesn’t stop there, the true beneficial owner of International Aircraft Leasing Corporation is not Karlheinz Schreiber it is Engelbert Schreiber- a mistake that results from a false interpretation of the facts by Harvey Cashore of the CBC’s Fifth Estate.

Kroll is the company that hired Jock Ferguson, a former CBC journalist and the journalist that was asked by the German magazine Der Spiegel to recruit the CBC in Canada on the Airbus case.

Morden also advised on the United Nations Volcker inquiry- the Oil for Food program, whereas the Chair of the Inquiry was a former director of a Paul DesMarais company and, the former employer of Brian Mulroney.

The RCMP is in what some have dubbed the ultimate battle for the agency’s credibility and honour.

The man that is called in to moderate the dispute is Reid Morden, a man that is closer to the financing of Al Qaeda and its principals that anyone else in North America.

The dispute within the RCMP is about the RCMP’s lack of actions in investigations of white collar crime that should have exposed the financiers of 9/11. It is about senior officers knowing that they could have acted and it is about their will to do the right thing.

Reid Morden would appear to have a vested interest in suppressing the complaints of the Assistant Commissioners rather than exploring the issues raised by the Assistant Commissioners in order to advance the fortunes of his private practice...

Point of diminishing returns.

2010-07-23T18:35:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Have you ever had that nagging impression that perhaps you are wrong? That just maybe things are not so black and white? Well, a lot of people out there right now are shaking their heads in disbelief, Conrad Black is out and the odds are he ain’t going back to jail.
Well then, if you ever had, this will help you understand the Conrad Black story.
Conrad Black wrote to me twice before he went to jail- and no it isn’t because I am so special nor do I know him personally. Conrad Black has a sense that everybody needs the chance to consider both sides of the proverbial medal and, given the fact that his legal predicaments were blown out of proportion in the media and by the American prosecutors, because of who he his- and I mean that in spades, Black didn’t hesitate to write to me at a time in his life where he couldn’t have been any busier. In fact he communicated with hundreds of individuals more important than me.

Not once I have heard any of his so called fair weather friends ever make any reference about Conrad Black as being a man of the people yet, when I read his e-mails I knew this, here was a man that would have shouted on the rooftops to proclaim his innocence. Brian Mulroney on the other hand never wrote to me, you see where I’m getting at?

I wrote about Conrad Black touching on issues that I will not repeat here. I had a purpose when I wrote to him and it wasn’t to become his friend but rather it was a fishing expedition. I never expected that he would even acknowledge my missive but in the back of my mind if he did, I would get some insight on what this man really is.
That is exactly what happened and I can’t tell you that I felt good about prodding the man. What his answer gave me, other than the words he assembled to form the reply, was that although what I wrote about was non-sense, he just had to set me straight. I appreciated that, honestly! But I knew that what I was writing about was designed to provoke an answer although I never expected him to actually do that. His answer opened a window on the personality of Conrad Black. What I began to appreciate about the man I would never read about in all of the news reports I read about his case.

Conrad Black talked to everyone no matter how unpleasant idiots-that’s me, can be.

I made references to the fact that if he went to jail that he should consider changing his attitudes and his over the top vocabulary; I wrote that if he keeps acting like that he would get his ass kicked in jail- just friendly advice really. A few months into his prison term, he gave an interview to a British newspaper and in that article, Lord Black made sure that everyone should know that nothing unpleasant had happened to him in jail...
That’s when I had that sense that he remembered what I had said. Conrad Black took my advice under consideration... One day I should ask around about how he talked to his fellow inmates... I also wrote that his complaining was useless even degrading, that he should observe and write about life with individuals that were found to have acted criminally. I thought that no other prisoner could convey the insight that Black had the talent and time to study. I foolishly thought that a mind such as his could begin to bridge the gap between criminals and the rest of society, I felt that this was a once in a life time opportunity. But Black was sent to a regimented country club, so much for that idea...

In time, I understood why Black got in trouble. Today I was watching a BBC report whereas one of his critical friends was stating that Conrad Black was a millionaire living the life of a billionaire. The so-called friend was also a former employer of his wife Barbara Amiel. The chap went on to say that Conrad Black was running his company like it was a private company but that in fact, the money he was spending wasn’t his, it belonged to the shareholders of the company... That friend was repeating things that I had written almost word for word a couple of days ago and somehow, it just didn’t feel quite right, something was missing...
I am a person that is of the opinion that if you invest in a company you invest in its leader. People invested in Conrad Black’s companies because of Conrad Black. People who knew Conrad Black in the business world also knew about his lifestyle and the apparent extravagant extremes he and his wife indulged in. Let’s face it, Conrad Black is no Warren Buffet, and Buffet has nothing on Black. Both men represent the polar opposites of what a true business leader can be. Buffet will eventually leave this life having had the opportunity to enjoy everything that life has to offer but having none of it while Conrad Black did the exact opposite although he didn’t have the financial resources of the Warren Buffets of the world. Buffet constantly hammered a common sense approach to business and life while Black challenged conventionality and practicality every time he took a breath. Investors and directors that got involved with Conrad Black saw the writing on the wall but ignored all warnings until the day they had to come to terms with their wallets. Like children playing with matches, they had fun until they got burnt.

What I am trying to say here is that whatever Conrad Black did was certainly questionable but it isn’t like it couldn’t have been prevented. More to the point, partners of Conrad Black drooled over the opportunity to be in business with Black like a teenage boy can’t wait to take his pants off for his first roll in the hay. For the good and the bad, Conrad Black’s newspapers strived because of Conrad Black and as such, Black reckoned that he was entitled to his excess’ and no one had a problem with that until it was time to leave the party.

Now like I wrote yesterday, if you take something from someone without their consent you too are playing with fire but, nothing should be said in the Conrad Black saga unless we acknowledge the naivety of Black’s partners. There are two sides to a story and it is disturbing to me that we never read about how stupid Black’s partners were. There is this unwritten rule in the media whereas victims are never questioned, where bad press only goes to one side.

We are talking about savvy, sophisticated individuals that oversaw Conrad Black’s business empire yet the media and the American prosecutors would have us believe that Black surreptitiously tricked them by having his personal lifestyle exposed in the media for all to see for years on end? Hide the truth where everyone can see it? Come on!

Conrad Black was wrong but he was lynched by a bunch of offended virgins bent on retribution and whom would never dare admit that there isn’t an orgy they didn’t enjoy.

Fade to Black

2010-07-22T18:57:00.001-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

I will hate myself in the morning for writing this but here it goes.

Conrad Black knew the deal when he went into it. He was greedy and tried to milk as much as he could from it and, he got caught and prosecuted.

Think of this, Rupert Murdoch and Bill Gates and the Oracle of Omaha-sic, Warren Buffet, they were never prosecuted and sent to jail. In fact statistics that I actually took the time to look at, very quickly, tell me that only one in twenty CEOs in the United States ever end up in front of a criminal court. For those of you that wonder about that number and how it correlates with regular citizens? It is about the same, one in twenty individuals will actually end up being charged criminally.

Conrad Black- the criminal statistic, fits in a general demographic that is not unusual- as he proclaimed his case to be. Yet there is something abnormal about the Black case when you compare it to similar cases involving less financially comfortable accused. That is, of the one hundred cases reviewed- in order to write this post that I will regret, ninety one of these cases bared the same legal dynamics as the Black case however, only the Conrad Black and the Enron guy case will be essentially re-visited although all of them could be. Now, I took the time to reach attorneys and, when possible individuals accused of similar crimes as Black and they tell me that their greatest obstacle in having their case shoved back into courts is their lack of financial resources. One man that didn’t want to be named tells me that he has more of a case than Black does. He was accused of the same things but only for one hundred and seventy thousand dollars compared to the millions that Black pocketed.

He is two years into his seven year jail term and he will do most of it in a regular penitentiary, where things are usually less comfortable than where Black was lodged. But here is the difference between Black and the rest of them. Of the men I talked to, they all admitted that what they did was a mistake on their part. While all of them question the jail sentences they receive they all agree on one thing, they took money from others before that money actually got to the individuals it was questionably suppose to go to.
Conrad Black intercepted revenues that a jury later found to be in part, the rightful property of others that were legal partners in a business venture with Conrad Black.

Now the question here is very simple, is it considered stealing if you take something from people that these individuals didn’t know that they had coming to them?

The answer is yes but, Conrad Black insists that it is not, period. Or to be fair he doesn’t seem to think that he should go to jail for that. However the reality of our judicial system is that if you take from others without their consent it is stealing. When you steal and you get caught, there is a good chance that you will go to jail and that is what has happened to Conrad Black until reality of the circumstances got legafied.
This said I agree with these guys I talked to and I sympathize with Conrad Black, jail is not a pleasant place to be. But there is a big difference between Black and the other guys I talked to, that is, the other guys don’t walk around like their shit don’t stink.

More to the point, they don’t come across as intelligent as Conrad Black, which led me to a whole different set of questions which I can wrap up into one efficient phrase: Would it have made that much of a difference in Conrad Black’s life if he would have forgone this extra cash?

The answer I came up with is, no, Conrad Black would still have been a millionaire but perhaps he would have had to trim is appetite for eccentricities. In other words, Conrad Black is much much dumber than he presumes to be, in hindsight.

This led me to conclude that Conrad Black’s charades throughout his ordeal is consistent with the image he promoted of himself, what you see and hear from Mr. Black is a conveniently suggestive version of the truth smartly wrapped in a false sense of authenticity designed to benefit only Conrad Black at the expense of others.

In other words, Conrad Black is full of shit.

Yet consider this, after all that has happened and after all the fines and lawsuits are settled, what exactly is going to be left of Conrad Black’s fortune?

Conrad Black, the man who quotes Shakespeare more often than he farts knew the risk and he still went for it. He did that because he was greedy and, he decided to take the money because he is dumber than he could figure.

Conrad Black has nothing over any other criminals other than striking similarities.

And from all he knows and has, he certainly can’t seem to make the most out of it.

That is not how a heralded leader of the business community should fade out of immediate memory.

CSIS Chief challenges corrupt politicians; Journalists and Member of Parliament on the attack.

2010-07-20T20:08:00.002-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

I can’t remember an instance whereas I had anything good to say about CSIS but, I will say this, our national spies’R us have at least ten football fields of room to improve, nothing but room, can’t go any deeper into the abyss.

When you have an organization like CSIS and you are its Chief, you would want to improve moral- because let’s face it CSIS needs some sugar, Chief Fadden, like a good football coach, put all his staff in the game when he outed tidbits of intel whereas he alleged that certain politicians from different strokes are either compromised by foreign interests or likely are soft targets.
Everybody in the new building suddenly felt that there was a game on and they were all part of it.

For once CSIS is a proud bunch.

This is something that has been missing here in Canada, an institution with pride and a sense of purpose, a branch of government that all Canadians can be proud of. An institution led by a man willing to stir the pot a man leading his troops. RCMP eat your boots out.

There you have it; I said something that is almost nice about CSIS...

The Chief went out and said something that everybody knew for years, Canada is a vital player on the world stage, our natural resources are under threat and our politicians are selling pieces bit by bit for personal gains. Yes theset cats sitting in Parliament and at your local city hall and your provincial Parliament, they’ll sell you out if they can make a buck with the reasonable expectation of not getting caught.

Need an example? Brian Mulroney and Stephen Harper- the Right Honourable one, and their ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Chief Fadden, not to tut my horn, read my lines about Mulroney having received Airbus kickbacks from a company owned by an individual instrumental in the 9/11 financing. At the time I came out with that zinger Mulroney was bragging that Harper was his “Protégé”. Mulroney, a man sleeping with the enemy was advising the man in the most powerful office in the land. Nobody got much closer to Harper than Mulroney- the man the Muslim Brotherhood had on their payroll.

Bribe-O-Matic, as he is known in international circles, Mulroney was un ceremoniously kicked out of the inner circle of Stephen Harper soon after I first discussed the issues with New York reporters at a time when Harper was addressing a foreign affair think tank. Harper was caught in between negatives- to use an expression by NDPer turned Liberalite, Bob Rae.

Of course Bobbie Rae knows about the ties Mulroney has with the Muslim Brotherhood but you don’t see him making any waves about that? But then again, Rae is not the only one that knows, the CBC news apparatus- the gene pool of all things Governor Generals are made of, knew and concealed the news for years. When things heated up in the Airbus case, the CBC’s collaborators were hired by interested parties in the scandal and the CBC’s Fifth Estate suddenly flat out misrepresented to Canadians the Airbus circumstances. CBC journalist lied flat out to protect their jobs and perhaps book deals...

Harvey Cashore and Stevie Cameron refused to explain how they got it wrong and misled Canadians. Cashore went one step further, he wrote a book and called it “The Truth Shows Up”. The CBC truth that is...

There is not one member of the Canadian Parliament that doesn’t know about the allegations that Mulroney has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood- I've talked to most of them and wrote to all of them at one poibnt or another.

I am told that Harper distanced his government from Mulroney out of fear that the information would be picked up by the American media.

When Karlheinz Schreiber’s Accountant testified in front of the ethics committee, Pelosi admitted that at the time Mulroney was bribed in the Airbus case, Schreiber and Pelosi shared offices with Engelbert Schreiber, a man currently being sued in The United States for his role in the financing of the 9/11 attacks.

Terrorist and financiers of one of the biggest terrorist attacks in history, Mulroney/Schreiber, The Prime Minister of Canada, all tied neatly together and yet, Parliament wants to hang Fadden? Where was Parliament when Pat Martin of the NDP was the only member of the house with the balls to ask a real question? Where was everybody else when Pat Martin asked Pelosi; do you know a man called Engelbert Schreiber?
Where were the journalists?

A man accused of financing the terrorists that conducted the 9/11 attacks had one of his companies operated by Karlheinz Schreiber to bribe Brian Mulroney and just before that question was asked by Pat Martin, Mulroney was a senior advisor to Harper...

The long and short was that terrorism interests had direct access to the Prime Minister of Canada and not one member of Parliament, not one journalist, no one, looked into it...

CSIS’ Chief is a true patriot, a man that took his oath seriously and Canadian journalist with members of Parliament are attacking the one man in Canada that dared to stand up?

There is no such thing as journalism in Canada, propaganda is Canadian news. Most columnists I know are glorified grammatical bus drivers, they drive information down Canadian throats.

Parliament is contaminated by professional pension seekers whom, for the first time in years were actually scared when Fadden came out and barked. Suddenly they saw the dog that the sign warned about.

And then there is the Prime Minister of Canada, the man advised by a Muslim Brotherhood western facilitator, Brian Mulroney.

Director Fadden, anytime and for free.

Stevie Cameron comments on the Oliphant Commission Report

2010-07-16T13:00:00.002-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Stevie Cameron posted the first part of what might be a series of comments pertaining to the Airbus case. You can read the post here.:

However, to help readers understand why Mrs. Cameron might feel obliged to follow up on the Airbus story, I wrote back to her with the following comments.

Hello Mrs. Cameron;

Since you brought yourself back in the fray I thought I would re-iterate some of the updated facts in the Airbus/ Mulroney/Schreiber circumstances.

1) At the end of June 2007 Justice Alban Garon, his wife and their neighbour were found dead in the Garon home. The murders were conducted in the same scripted matter as was elaborated on by Arthur Hailey in his last book called Detective. A book he wrote after his adventures with Brian Mulroney's trustee Bruce Verchere, on which you touched on in your book, Blue Trust.
2) Justice Garon's long life friend was the attorney that represented Mr. Mulroney after the latter was informed of the letter of request to the Swiss authorities.
3) The RCMP assisted the Ottawa Police in the murder investigation of Justice Garon and as such, they have investigated potential relationships between certain involved parties in the Airbus case and omitted to advise investigators of the Ottawa police of their concerns and findings.
4) Finally, you had identified in previous books that IAL was Schreiber's company. During the testimony of Georgio Pelosi in front of the ethics committee, Pelosi admitted that he shared offices with Engelbert Schreiber the founder and holder of the founder's rights for Ial when he was asked by Pat Martin. Engelbert Schreiber is being sued in the United States by the family trust of John O'Neil, the former head of security at the World Trade Center; E. Schreiber is accused of being instrumental in the financing of the terrorist attacks in New York on September the 11th 2001.

As you had written about, Mulroney's former partner had intimated to you before he passed away that he dumped the Banco Ambrosiano case on Verchere's laps because the bodies were flying all over the place...

The litigation part of the case was sent to my Montreal attorney James Woods.

The investigation conducted by the Calvi family was conducted by a former investigator of Kroll Inc., an investigative company that advised on the Airbus case at the request of the RCMP. Kroll was also the former employer of John O'Neil the head of security at the WTC and, Kroll is also the former employer of your former partner in the Airbus story, Jock Ferguson.

Ironically, the Forensic accountant that testified at the Oliphant Commission is also a former employee of Kroll.

Hear no Governor general, see no Governor General

2010-07-14T17:23:00.001-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

I told family and close friends recently that since the Oliphant report had been public, I was done with this hell I’ve been part of for the better part of twenty years.
It is ironic how, for the first part of my life people kept telling me that I always quit stuff, how I never finish what I started, and then, for the latter part of my adult life, the same individuals had been complaining that I was making too much out of this thing, that I was over compensating for the little things that I didn’t follow up on when I was younger...

I’ve always been very polite and shy with friends and family, but frankly, what the heck do they know...

Earlier this year I was asked to look into the circumstances behind the murder of Justice Garon, his wife and their neighbour. I was asked to do so at about the same time that Dr. David Johnston was allegedly interviewing the RCMP about their investigation of the Airbus circumstances. At that time the RCMP was also investigating the murder of Justice Garon and another incident whereas the house of a federal tax judge had been shot up. As it turns out, the latter’s son is now married to Omar Kahdr’s sister.

Going back through my notes I came across thoughts I had written during an interview with interested parties in the matter of the Airbus case and the RCMP investigation of the scandal. The first note that I had written down was a reminder to analyze any circumstances that might be related to tax matters in the Verchere trust. Bruce Verchere, Mulroney’s then trustee, had allegedly taken Mulroney’s Airbus kickbacks to reimburse his wife for the money he had squandered. My goal was to look for a relationship and/or affiliations between Brian Mulroney and any individuals of influence at the Federal tax courts of Canada.

From these notes I worked my way back to events prior to Mulroney suing the federal government and there, I found that Mulroney’s attorney, acting on behalf of Brian in the Airbus case was a lifelong friend of Justice Alban Garon. When I looked up the circumstances behind Alban Garon’s murder I found out that he had been brutally murdered in the same fashion as was artistically implied by author Arthur Hailey in his last book entitled Detective, a book Hailey wrote after a frustrating episode between Hailey’s youngest daughter and Bruce Verchere, Mulroney’s tax man... Verchere had impregnated Hailey’s youngest daughter and Verchere’s kids former babysitter... No wonder the wife wasn’t amused.
But yet, it didn’t click; judges get murdered all the time... Tax judges in Canada are even more prone to extreme remedies given our tax levels right?

Eventually curiosity got the best of me and I set out to ask some people direct questions. What I mean by direct questions is that I ask questions and, if my interviewee is smart, he’ll know to answer truthfully... I ain’t shy when it comes to asking questions.

At the time, I also found out that he RCMP were involved in the investigation of Justice Alban Garon’s murder and I asked the obvious question; how could your computerized analysis system not flag the judge’s murder to the Bruce Verchere Estate/ Brian Mulroney restitution claims on which Alban Garon was involved in?
“We can’t confirm or deny the RCMP’s role in any ongoing investigations” I was told. So, I turned around made a few inquiries and asked people at the RCMP that owed me a favour. Turns out the RCMP not only had flagged the Garon murders with the Verchere/Mulroney circumstances, they had actually looked into it without however, sharing that tid bit of information with either the Ottawa police or the Ontario Provincial Police.
I was told that if there was anything to it that the Ottawa Police Force was well placed to receive any concerns the RCMP might have since the Chief of Police in Ottawa was former brass material with the RCMP... Somehow, after serious considerations, that didn’t sit with me in the same way that my interlocutor intended.

At that time I shelved the Garon circumstances because, like Andrew Coyne likes to say, any reasonable person would never go as far as to assume that the various parties involved in the Airbus case would go as far as killing a Federal Judge”. Then I got this call.

The call initiated from the United States, Massachusetts I believe. The caller telling me that if they can kill a judge, they can do the same with me. The caller hung up before I can relate to him that friends have been wondering for years now as to when someone would shoot me but alas, his long distance card must have ran out of time...

While I am a very trusting guy I am also very thorough. I set out to have all suspects met and their DNA secretly collected, except of course for Brian Mulroney, don’t need to be so personal with the former boss and, I have had many opportunities in the past to collect information emanating from the hollowed corridors of the law firm.
Then I went back- metaphorically speaking, to the RCMP and provided them with my unreasonable concerns regarding the death of Justice Garon and the involvement/ role of the judge in backroom dealings to provide a tax opportunity to the Vercheres at the request of Brian Mulroney and his attorney, Alban Garon’s good friend...

It seems that Justice Garon had no tax tricks that he was willing to endow on the widow of the former tax attorney and trustee of Brian Mulroney. What isn’t clear however is if the Verchere family had given to Mulroney the cash Bruce Verchere had received from Airbus Industries before or after Alban Garon gave his opinion to the lot.

Soon after Mulroney handed over a prestigious award to Alban Garon for his life achievements as a jurist, shortly thereafter, he was found decapitated in his own home.

When the terms of reference for the Oliphant inquiry were drafted by Dr. David Johnston, the venerable scholar assured all Canadians that the Airbus investigation conducted by the RCMP was well tilled ground and that as such, the Royal Commission was not to need to ask any questions whatsoever about the specific Airbus case unless, new evidence should come out. Of course if you are bound by law to restrain yourself from discussing a specific issue, then how in the world could new evidence come up?
A question our lot of Canadian journalists never explored...
The very first thing that came to my mind was, did the RCMP represent to Dr Johnston that they were currently investigating the circumstances behind Alban Garon’s murder and, did they convey to Dr. Johnston their suspicions that the murders might have been motivated by circumstances derived from the Airbus case. Did the RCMP at the time, inform Dr. Johnston that the murders of Alban Garon, his wife and their friend and neighbour were part of an ongoing investigation that had imminent ties to their prior investigation of the Airbus matters?

The answer is that they would have had to inform Dr. Johnston.

What Dr. Johnston needs to answer now is did the RCMP inform him of this particular development. If indeed Dr. Johnston was aware of the circumstances and decided to collaborate with the RCMP by avoiding to have the Oliphant Commission trampling over a major murder investigation then, why then could he not advise the Prime Minister to suspend any calls for an inquiry until such time as all investigations related to the Airbus circumstances had been concluded.

Then again if the RCMP omitted to advise Dr. Johnston on the circumstances related to the murder of Justice Garon and the role the former judge had played in the settlement between Mulroney and his former trustee’s wife then Dr. Johnston should, as Canada’s Governor General elect, explain to all Canadians why and how a seasoned legal mind as his, could be duped so easily when he was personally aware of some of the circumstances that tied Bruce Verchere and Justice Garon to the Airbus case?

Legal Fiction; the Illusion of the reasonable person.

2010-07-12T19:49:00.001-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Andrew Coyne of Maclean’s Magazine wrote a piece today on his blog entitled “That David Johnston scandal, in full” see here: .

Mr Coyne’s perspectives on the appointment of David Johnston as Canada’s next Governor General is based on the legal standard of “the reasonable person”.

A reasonable person can be described as follows: A fictional person used as a comparative legal standard to represent an average member of society and how he or she would behave or think, especially in determining negligence; sometimes formulated as "a person of ordinary prudence exercising due care in like circumstances."

After reading that post by Mr. Coyne I was reminded of a murder case I was dragged into in Hamilton, Ontario, a few years ago. The case made headlines locally and in Toronto, a child had died and the mother was an immediate suspect due to her age, her visible minority status and the fact that she was a single parent.

This was my first experience with a journalist when I began to answer questions that Gloria Galloway- of the Globe and Mail then of The Hamilton Spectator, had in regards to the death of a baby boy. Ms. Galloway intimated that she had had a run in, personally, with the Children’s Aid and that this was why she was covering the story. The Children’s Aid, the Coroner’s Office and the Hamilton police all had been in quite a hurry to put out the public relations fire that was still at their proverbial ankles, they had a dead boy from a single mother whose boyfriend had alleged criminal ties. Someone was going to pay and it wasn’t going to be the Toronto Coroner or any doctor that provided health care services to Maliek, no, they could all afford the best lawyers... It was the mother they were going to hang in order to protect the good doctors and the Coroner whom, years later it would be discovered was anything but an honest Coroner.

An American Doctor, and a long time client of mine, from a prominent American university that I consulted on the case had a dissenting opinion from the one of the Coroner and the Medical staff of the Hamilton hospital were Maliek had been previously treated. According to the Doctor, if indeed Maliek was in a body cast, one circumstance that had to be considered is if the child had been suffocated by the cast due to over-feeding. In other words had the child been overfed and if so, did the treating physician set proper protocols to supervise the diet of the infant.
According to the mother she had been handed back her son by the hospital- and the Children’s Aid Society of Hamilton, and told not to feed him too much...

Maliek Willie died because he ate normal meals, something the Children’s Aid investigators wanted nothing of and a fact that Sgt McNiven of the Hamilton Major Crimes division dismissed on the spot.
Maliek’s mother went to jail because she fed her child.
Maliek Willie was a victim of our medical system, he was a victim of the investigators of the Hamilton police, he was a victim of the reasonable people of the Children’s Aid Society and, his mother was dishonoured and jailed.
Gloria Galloway continued to follow the story, she reported along with others at the Spec, but none of these journalists never went and got the story, Galloway and her colleagues wrote about what the supposedly reasonable people were saying about the circumstances that led to the death of the child. They inadvertedly promoted the opinions of the very people that had something to protect, their jobs.

A few years later I read that the Coroner in questions had been found to have doctored reports in various investigations here in Ontario. I wondered if Maliek’s mother would finally get justice from the reasonable people.
So, when I read Mr. Coyne’s post the first thing that came to mind was disappointment. Coyne was now hiding behind the reasonable people standard on the Airbus/Johnston story. While Coyne was typing from both sides of the keyboard he did mention the pay cut that David Johnston would incur by accepting the GG Job, he would imply that anybody questioning Johnston’s integrity must be un-reasonable since Johnston is going to lose four hundred thousand a year...
But Coyne- like other journalists at the Globe and Mail, never asked the real question that led to the appointment of Dr. David Johnston, he never asked why the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada kept secret the formation of a special committee to study candidates for the appointment.

He didn’t do that because reasonable journalist don’t concern themselves with simple questions such as; why after more than a hundred years, is it necessary all of a sudden to create a secret committee to appoint a Governor General in Canada?

Why did Coyne not write about the fact that funds provided to Mulroney by Karlheinz Schreiber came from entities owned and controlled by the same man that is now being sued in the United States as a co-conspirator in the scheme that financed the 9/11 attacks?

You see, a reasonable man, even a journalist, faced with that kind of allegations would have called Lucy Komisar and the lawyer for the Estate of John O’Neil- the former head of Security for the World Trade Center in order to ascertain the testimony of Georgio Pelosi- Karlheinz Schreiber’s former accountant, in front of the Ethics Committee whereas Pelosi admitted that he shared offices with a prominent Liechtenstein banker by the name of Engelbert Schreiber the same man now being accused for his role in the financing of the 9/11 attacks.

A reasonable man would look at the fact that three thousand people died that day in New York, that same man would listen to the testimony of Georgio Pelosi and then, any reasonable person would go back to the Prime Minister’s Office with these allegations and ask clearly, like a reasonable journalist, why did the PMO kept secret the formation of the committee that chose Dr. David Johnston?

A reasonable Andrew Coyne would have done that when years ago he was a hungry journalist.

The Karlheinz Schreiber Conclusion, Canadians are dumber by the pound...

2010-07-08T19:01:00.001-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

I always wondered why in the world Karlheinz Schreiber would entertain having a conversation with me over the Airbus affair. At first I thought the guy was ready to oblige anybody at least once, but we met- exchanged looks, and talked over the phone on a few occasions. This said, don’t believe for a second that Schreiber was comfortable talking with me or that his attorney was even aware of it, no, Schreiber knew that from the time I started commenting on the Airbus circumstances that his extradition was a foregone conclusion; it was only a matter of time if I kept going at it.

Schreiber’s intelligence on me was dead wrong but then again, everyone else’s information that was gathered in an effort to “get to know me better” was, to say the least, off the mark by a country mile. Schreiber- not to say Edward Greenspan, believed that from the time I met him in the King Street offices of lawyer Eddie Greenspan in Toronto, that I would fade away, that I would give up.
I accused Schreiber and Mulroney of having direct ties with individuals that allegedly conspired to finance the 9/11 attacks. Schreiber wasn’t amused and Mulroney never dared to sue me or for that matter bring criminal charges against me, the reason, both know that I was right on the money. When Schreiber forced the hand of Prime Minister Harper to call a Royal Commission into the business dealings between Schreiber and Mulroney, the Ethics Committee began a series of hearings in the matters. I wrote to most of the members of the committee and to all members of Parliament. I told the members that the reason why Schreiber was so tight lipped about the Airbus circumstances was because he realized that the entities he used to receive the funds from Airbus Industries to pay Brian Mulroney, were the same entities that were used to funnel funds to some of the terrorists that conducted the 9/11 attacks.

Everybody thought I was nuts.

But then, Pat Martin- NDP Winnipeg Center, a member of the ethics Committee that I had also written to, decided to ask Georgio Pelosi- Schreiber’s accountant, if he knew a man by the name of Engelbert Schreiber? -Engelbert Schreiber is one of the bankers currently being sued by the Estate of John O’Neil- the head of security for the World Trade Center at the time of the attacks, Pelosi’s answer was that yes, they shared offices together...

There you had it, the man that was s senior advisor to the Prime Minister of Canada- Brian Mulroney, had received money from a man that was sharing office space with the men that helped funnel the funds to subsidize the worst terrorist attack on North American soil.

To put things in perspective, that is closer to Al Qaeda than Omar Kadhr and his family or for that matter that other chap that was gently beaten for ten million dollars. But more disturbingly, the cowards that ran that outfit we call the RCMP, knew since August of 2001 about the relationship.

I have long life friends that are agents for the RCMP and there isn’t a day that goes buy where they don’t save the lives of countless children by putting their own life on the line every single minute of their working days, and they agree with me, the RCMP is rotten to the core when it comes to the top brass, all cowards my friends would say, all individuals they are ashamed to admit that they work for.

There is no pride anymore in the RCMP.

There is no pride anymore either in being a politician. We have a Prime Minister so hell bent on protecting the Conservative brand - and his name from being affiliated with terrorist financiers, that his office found a way to dupe a well respected University President, Mr. David Johnston. Johnston drafted the terms of reference for the Oliphant Commission at the request of the Prime Minister’s Office. At the request of the Prime Minister, in a confidential memo sent to Professor Johnston, the Prime Minister advised that he would not support an inquiry that would deal with any allegations pertaining to the Airbus kickback allegations, the Prime Minister would not authorize the expenses.

So therefore, Professor Johnston decided that he would accommodate the Prime Minister regardless of his findings and/or opinions, for as long no new evidence came to light...

When I received a phone call from a Liberal MP from Nova Scotia- Robert Thibault, I told him that the relationship between Schreiber and Mulroney was contentious because of the terrorism financing angle. Then I advised the RCMP again directly as well as the Prime Minister of Canada and all members of his Cabinet at the time.

Everybody was aware and nobody asked any questions or to see any evidence, nobody at all.

When Pat Martin asked that question to Pelosi and Pelosi answered that he shared offices with Engelbert Schreiber, Pat Martin, like all of the other members of Parliament, knew that Engelbert Schreiber was the true beneficial owner behind the entities that Karlheinz Schreiber used to disburse the Airbus cash.

There wasn’t the shred of a doubt in any member of Parliament’s minds that day, Brian Mulroney, the advisor to Prime Minister Harper, was concealing his association with individuals that have allegedly financed the 9/11 attacks. Prime Minister Harper was given the benefit of doubt and Harper demonstrate his intentions by preventing any members of his cabinet and caucus from having any contact with Brian Mulroney.

In private, Brian Mulroney was as bad as anybody else affiliated with any terrorist groups.

The man we will now have as a representative of the Queen and as head of our armed forces, the next Governor General of Canada, Professor David Johnston, is the last man standing that conspired to conceal evidence in the Airbus matters against Brian Mulroney and Karlheinz Schreiber, he did so at the request and with express directives from Stephen Harper- there is no Right Honourable in that sentence.

David Johnston has read the comments I made in this blog and he has inquired about these comments with the PMO. In the end he lied when he said that he reviewed all of the RCMP files extensively, he didn’t according to sources with the RCMP and the Privy Council.

David Johnston is a liar and he is your next Governor General of Canada- immunity an’ all....

The Unforgiven

2010-07-06T19:52:00.000-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

Brian Mulroney was the son of an electrician. He was the son of a man that had to get up in the morning to go to work. Now for those of you that have some experience in the construction world, electricians are not framers... they aren’t brick layer’s labourers either and they don’t work half as hard as landscapers or concrete guys either, but nevertheless, a tradesman is a tradesman and all my respect goes to Mulroney Senior, he was a man that did it with nothing more than a dream and a prayer. A man who’s honour will forever precede his name.

In the back of his mind, Brian Mulroney had some misplaced doubts for his father and what he stood for given, what he had to work with. What I mean is that being an electrician was never what young Brian had in mind, he wanted better, he wanted to be the boss and he wanted to do as little as possible to get the most out of this God forsaken life...So did Senior.
Let’s compare the two Mulroneys. One had to face his children on a daily basis with very little to offer but the bare bones necessities of life while the other had the RCMP as babysitters. One had his wife shop around for specials at the store to get the most out of his pay check while junior had to slap his wife around to stop her from shopping around so he could preserve some of his revenues.
Brian Mulroney made sure that his kids couldn’t be as big as he was, while his father wanted his kids to be better than what he was...

When Brian Mulroney- former Prime Minister of Canada, invokes the memory of his father and his family’s reputation, what he is saying is that his father was a much better man than most...

But what about Brian’s kids? What do they got to shoot for? Canadian Idol? Come on seriously? Brokers? Married to money? Jewish at that...

Really?

Let’s compare two Canadian leaders’ kids; Pierre Elliot Trudeau and Brian Mulroney, ouch! I know.

To be fair, I’ve met with Pierre Elliot Trudeau on a personal basis several times however, this doesn’t mean that I favour one over the other, in fact, Trudeau kept complaining that I was the only person that he allowed to insult him on predictable basis... Which by the way reminds me that PET worked as a miner in a Malartic Gold mine when he was a student, the guy had actually done some real work...
Mulroney junior on the other hand went to a military college to become Captain Canada.

But with the kids. Let’s spell it out clearly and obviously for the sake of comparisons. Trudeau’s kids were an adventurous and dedicated bunch, one died while on an adventure and the other worked his ass off advancing the cause of being a child in this world... One is now a politician with ideals- and one son of a gun to be reckon with, eventually. Trudeau’s wife has been known to sport the odd facial “echimose”- French for black eye, and is rumoured to have gotten it on with Mick Jagger of the Rolling Stones. OK so I included the wives.
Trudeau’s “progeniture” had the same challenges as did the Mulroney flock, that is, how to supplant the old man from the proverbial throne...

Well, the Trudeau kids went to extremes, now let’s look at how the Mulroney kids elevated their games...

One went to work for one of dad’s newspaper patrons- the Toronto Sun, writing opinions fed to him by the man himself. Then, in a bid to carve himself an independence, he became a host for a TV show for another of dad’s patrons, CTV. As a host for CTV’s Canadian Idol, Ben Mulroney showed all Canadians just exactly what the Prime Ministership of Canada can get your kids... Not only couldn’t the kid write anything of substance- for a newspaper that is more interested in profits for degrading young women than actually impacting the mind of Canadians, but he couldn’t host the show any better than a robot would have. With no talent in tow, Ben Mulroney proved to Canadians that he could go on milking it without getting his hands traumatized. He also married into a Jewish bankroll.
The rest is even worst, one married into Jewish money- lending yet more credibility to a piece by a Drummondville magazine who’s editors, Senior threatened to kill on National TV- in a broadcast carried by, you guessed it, CTV. The Mulroney daughter was groomed as a debutante- perhaps the first Canadian one, for lack of any motivation. The magazine in Drummondville- called “Frank”, referred and/or implied that the Mulroney daughter struck them as a higher class of prostitute, a child brought up to marry money, almost a girl for sale.
Then there was the one that might become a banker if only he could be employed by one. Then all of sudden he was, just like Conrad Black’s fucked up son...Black’s son however went to work for a Canadian stock broker, reading attentively the news streamed by Bloomberg...

On the wives side, Trudeau’s wife clearly has the edge with Mick Jagger while Brian’s wife had to find out the hard way that Boy George wasn’t a switch hitter...

Yet on the Prime Ministerial side, both have nothing to envy from Jean Chretien although one took a kinship to former Prime Minister Paul Martin and no, it isn’t Pierre Trudeau.

However, both Brian Mulroney and Pierre Elliot Trudeau have one thing in common- or better yet one individual in common, Pierre Desmarais Sr., the father in law of Jean Chretien’s daughter, a man who’s business interests have more ties to Al Qaeda than Omar Kahdr could ever brag about...

Yet only Brian Mulroney is followed in retirement with a nagging scandal, that is the Airbus bribery case...

I took a long time to ponder why we would pin all of Canada’s political dirty laundry on the shoulder of that electrician’s son, on Brian Mulroney’s shoulders, and then it came to me, better him than the RCMP...

Better him than a Sudbury boy with a few billions...

So what have we accomplished?

2010-06-19T23:15:00.001-04:00

A three hundred million dollars theft, a Prime minister accused of taking kickbacks, journalists more interested in a version of truth that gets them a book deal and, a federal police force so incompetent that you actually have a body count that runs in the thousands...

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

I got involved in this mess back in 1990 when I decided to help a friend who was on the board of directors of a Vancouver Stock Exchange company. My friend was looking at possible liability issues when some shareholders of the company started making allegations that four million dollars was missing from the books.
It didn’t take long before we realized that there was more to the circumstances that met the eye. Once we began to lift the proverbial rocks to look what was under, we had to buy a calculator and hire lawyers, three hundred million dollars worth of assets had gone from right under the nose of the board of directors.
It took almost four years before we decided that this case had to be brought to the authorities. Finally we sent a file to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police after many meetings with the British Columbia Securities Commission.

The RCMP didn’t answer us for three years and when we pressed for answers, they claimed to have sent a letter to the wrong address, never thinking of verifying first before sending sensitive information. They had the name of the attorney for the shareholders in Vancouver but that was too easy, they never wrote to advise the attorney either.

It was in 1997 that I realized that some entities in the Isle of Man that had received my clients’ money illegally, had also received the funds referred to here in Canada as the kickbacks that Brian Mulroney had allegedly received for his role in the purchase of Airbus planes by Air Canada.
Again I contacted the RCMP and made the representations that we believed that we had evidence and government official witness’ that could help the RCMP in their investigation of the Airbus case. However, prior to initiating contact again with the RCMP I had a meeting in Detroit, Michigan with officer of Kroll International, a global private investigative firm at the request of some of Kroll’s investigators and analysts.
That meeting is actually what motivated me to contact the RCMP. At that meeting I learned that Kroll had acted as consultants in the Airbus investigation conducted by the RCMP through their then Canadian subsidiary, Kroll Canada. The meeting was arranged by a New York collaborator that we had hired in our case on and off since 1991. The firm was mostly comprised of former intelligence agents that worked at one point or another with a variety of government agencies in the United States.
At that meeting I was told that the RCMP knew that Mulroney had been receiving kickbacks, they knew where the money went and perhaps where it was at the time of the meeting. I was also advised of the concerns of Kroll’s Canadian sister company’s investigators and consultants.

The allegations that were forming at the meeting was that the RCMP saw more value in collecting intelligence on the individuals that actually laundered the money that Mulroney received rather than building a case to prosecute a former prime minister of Canada.

The RCMP had set out to collect intelligence on banks such as Riggs Bank of Washington D.C., Riggs-Valmet- a subsidiary of Riggs Bank at the time who would later be handling the twenty or so billion dollars scam that led to the Chairman of a Russian Bank called Bank Menatep, to be incarcerated for eight years. Riggs-Valmet also handled the fortune of Augusto Pinochet when at the time there was an international warrant to seize proceeds from any accounts held for the benefit of General Pinochet. In 2003, Riggs Bank was found to have laundered money for terrorism groups. One allegation was that funds went from accounts at Riggs bank to a charitable organization that then transferred the funds to one of the 9/11 attackers.

As a result, Riggs Bank was fined a record twenty five million dollars for its role in the transfer and handling of funds that in part, went to individuals that conducted the 9/11 attacks, all under the watchful eye of the RCMP.

Riggs Valmet invested the proceeds paid to Mulroney in a development venture to build condominiums in a ski resort called Telluride in Colorado. Mulroney’s lawyer, Bruce Verchere, was the trustee who handled the ownership paperwork.

In 1997, I was asked to advise the RCMP of the role and involvement of terrorism interests in the constellation of entities that we had analyzed over the years which led to the Detroit meeting.
By then however, it was obvious that the RCMP wouldn’t act.

Throughout the following years I made several requests with various members of the Chretien government to call for a Royal Commission of inquiry to investigate the role of the RCMP in our case and, subsequently in the Airbus case. The Chretien government stonewalled our requests and eventually sent two officers of the RCMP’s Integrated National Security Enforcement Team to threaten me, threats that I understood meant that my life would be in danger.

On the morning of the 9/11 attacks I was on the phone with officials of Jean Chretien’s office and the RCMP dispatched two officers the next morning to come and meet me in Toronto. It is at that meeting that I conveyed to the RCMP that I believed that I had evidence as to the financing of the attacks- it would be later that I would find out that on the 27th of August 2001, RCMP officials interviewed two suspects arrested in the Cayman Islands that asserted that Al-Qaeda was going to attacks Canadian and American targets by using commercial aircrafts as missiles.
In the following days I received a tip from our New York collaborators advising that I pick up the trail of two individuals travelling from Atlanta by bus on route to Canada through Niagara Falls. I did find the individuals that night and followed them from Niagara Falls Canada to Toronto. Upon arriving at the downtown bus terminal in Toronto, I immediately advised the same RCMP officers that had come to meet me on the twelfth of September 2001.

As it would turn out, the individuals that I followed into Canada a few days after the 9/11 attacks, would set out to recruit Canadians to carry out an attack here in Canada, the group became known as the Toronto Eighteen.

After all of this, in 2006 the RCMP was still refusing to investigate my clients’ case and the Airbus case. The force by then was disappointed with me for constantly accusing them of being partly responsible for the 9/11 attacks even if it only meant that they were totally incompetent- something of a themes whenever the RCMP is investigated as we have recently saw in the Air India case.

In fact the RCMP referred me to Harvey Cashore a producer at the CBC Fifth Estate; they told me to get the story in the public realm...

I met with Harvey Cashore on a few occasion and I did give him evidence that was given to me by the RCMP. Documents that I had sent to the force in 1995 that they forwarded to me in order to provide them to the CBC.

Now, all I’ll say here is that the CBC and Harvey Cashore had the evidence linking the money to Mulroney.

And then there was this persistent rumour that the brutal murder of a Canadian federal tax judge in 2007 was somehow related to the circumstances in the Airbus case. I was forced to look into the circumstances and as such I have advised the Ottawa Police Force Chief, Vern White- a former RCMP member.

In conclusion of this blog on the topics I have addressed since July of 2006, I can tell you this, journalists made money, RCMP officers will still get their pensions and there is no such thing as Canadian dignity.

But don’t feel too bad, the man that owned the companies that Karlheinz Schreiber used to funnel the Airbus kickbacks is now being sued in the United States for his role in the financing of the 9/11 attacks, his name, Engelbert Schreiber and the plaintiffs are family members of a former Kroll International executive.

The Oliphant Commission report confirms the Commission's staff incompetence.

2010-06-01T21:29:00.003-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

The most obvious thing I wish I could take out of the Oliphant report is that Justice Oliphant seemingly did everything he could under the circumstances, to stretch the envelope of the Commission's mandate to include anything possible related to the Airbus case.

Lets face it, Justice Oliphant knew from the onset that the terms of references had been manipulated and that the administration of justice would be led into disrepute by the highest office in the land, before he even had a chance to accept the appointment. The argument for the latter is simple, Professor Johnston on one hand claimed that the RCMP's investigation of the Airbus circumstances was beyond reproach, it was well tilled grounds he said in his report to Prime Minister Harper yet, the RCMP's investigation focused not only on the Airbus transactions but on the role of Karlheinz Schreiber and his contacts in the Mulroney government. The RCMP looked at the Airbus sale of aircrafts to Air Canada amongst other transactions and deals that Schreiber was involved in promoting to the then Conservative government of Brian Mulroney but, in that investigation was also included the Helicopter deal and the Thyssen armoured vehicle deal. In fact it is clear that the RCMP investigators had a more resounding success in their investigations of both the helicopter deal and the Thyssen armoured vehicle project.

But again, all three circumstances/deals were part of one central investigation, the one that looked at the dealings of Karlheinz Schreiber with Brian Mulroney and members of his cabinet.

When Professor Johnston called the Airbus investigation well tilled grounds he was referring to an investigation that did not only focus only on the Airbus deal it focused on the relationship that Karlheinz Schreiber had with Brian Mulroney.

Professor Johnston blatantly and selectively sliced and diced the RCMP investigation in order to focus the terms of references on circumstances of the RCMP efforts that he knew the Commission could not prove. In doing so, Johnston handed Justice Oliphant a mandate that he knew the Commission could not diligently conclude on.

The Royal Commission on the relationship between Karlheinz Schreiber and Brian Mulroney could not and, as we now can see for ourselves, would not be able to prove that their was a deal between Mulroney and Schreiber and, like Schreiber liked to say, why the hell did Mulroney ever admit to the payments to begin with?

This is perhaps the question that the Oliphant Commission should have focused on. Why the heck would Mulroney be so candid as to acknowledge the payments when in fact it would have been impossible to prove Schreiber's claims to begin with? Why give any credibility to any claims that Schreiber might advance?

In my humble opinion, the fact that counsel for the Commission never explored Mulroney's inexplicable admission as to the cash payments he received is by far what leads me to conclude that the Oliphant Commission staff were the wrong individuals to conduct any kind of inquiry.

When Mr. Wolson- Chief Counsel for the Commission tried to defend Professor Johnston's assertions about the RCMP's investigations of the Airbus case he said that at the height of an eight year investigation by a substantial police organization as many as twenty three investigators worked on the case... Mr. Wolson was trying to impress on whomever was listening that the RCMP had committed eight years on investigative resources to the Airbus case when in fact, there is less than two years worth of man hours.

That statement clearly shows that Wolson was seemingly impressed by numbers that are misleading and designed to lend a false sense of magnitude, something very strange coming from an attorney that is trained to pick apart circumstances.

If the Commission's counsel would have paid any attention to the details, he would have asked Brian Mulroney point blank: Why did you Mr. Mulroney admit to receiving payments when you knew- being an attorney, that it would have been impossible to prove.
Then, Wolson should have called author William Kaplan- a man heralded as a heroe for exposing Mulroney's admission, and then ask Kaplan who is himself an attorney, to explain how Mulroney's admissions came about. Wolson should have explored the relationship between Kaplan and Mulroney and perhaps even Kaplan's interests in helping Mulroney, a man he defended so jealously in his first book, a collection of misguided opinions laced with hope of recognitions.

Moreover, the Oliphant Commission could not be possibly qualified as diligent in their efforts of analyzing the Schreiber/Mulroney relationship without reviewing Mulroney's statements of accounts with his then and Blind trust manager lawyer Bruce Verchere. Verchere is the one that received the funds earmarked for Mulroney in the Airbus scandal, in fact, Verchere stole Mulroney's Airbus kickbacks to pay back the money he squandered from his wife.

If any of you were to walk in a police station and admit to having murdered someone although you hadn't committed the crime, there would be an investigation. Because you admit to something doesn't mean you did it, it still has to be proven and as such, my point is that the whole story of the cash payments is a well orchestrated hoax.

It was never proven that Mulroney did receive any of the payments and nobody is more keenly aware of that fact than Justice Oliphant and his sidekick Wolson.

The fact that the Oliphant Commission never diligently tested the issue of Mulroney's miraculous admission, at best, goes a long way to establish the Commissioner's incompetence.
Justice Oliphant clearly acknowledged that Mulroney is anything but forthcoming yet he didn't stop to think twice if there was any truth to Mulroney's admissions of having received the cash payments...

This begs the question as to just how incoherent is Justice Oliphant...

Oliphant Commission painted into a corner by the murder of Justice Alban Garon

2010-05-26T22:48:00.002-04:00

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

When Professor Johnston advised that the RCMP's investigation into the Airbus matters was “well tilled grounds”, he assumed that the federal police force mandated to protect the interests of the Crown at all costs had thoroughly investigated a case whereas the interests of the Crown were in direct conflict with the RCMP's mandate.

Surely Johnston was consumed by other concerns when he concluded that...

Professor Johnston may well be stating the truth if he claimed that RCMP representatives omitted to represent to him that the force- at the time of Mr. Johnston's enquiries about the Airbus investigation by the RCMP, was investigating the circumstances behind the murder of Justice Alban Garon, the Ottawa tax judge that was found dead in his apartment along with his wife and their neighbour.
Professor Johnston most likely never knew that there was a relationship between Justice Garon and Bruce Vechere's family trust representative and, Brian Mulroney. Furthermore, it is fair to imply that Dr. Johnston had no reasons to suspect that the murders of Justice Garon, his wife and their neighbour had anything at all to do with the Airbus case.

Now, I'll ask you here what you think about the following circumstances I am about to expose you to.

According to various sources and witness' both in Canada and overseas, a Montreal attorney by the name of Bruce Verchere had received funds on behalf of The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney, at the same time that Karlheinz Schreiber had dispensed his bribes to various government officials here in Canada in order to have Air Canada buy aeroplanes from Airbus Industries at the behest of Boeing.

Bruce Verchere was Brian Mulroney's blind trust manager while Mulroney was Prime Minister and during the period when Air Canada purchased the planes from Airbus industries. However, shortly before Mulroney left office Verchere landed in hot water with his wife after he got their former babysitter- the daughter of famed author Arthur Hailey, pregnant. Verchere's wife had filed for divorced and in the process found out that her husband had squandered most of the family's savings living a double life with the daughter of his client. Lynne Verchere hired investigators that found where the money had gone and in the process found out how much Mulroney got paid for his role in the purchase of Airbus jets by Air Canada.

Lynne Verchere didn't like the Mulroneys much since they seemed supportive of the relationship between Bruce Verchere and Diane Hailey. In fact, Stevie Cameron reports that Lynne Verchere slammed her home door in the face of Mila Mulroney when she came to offer her condolences after the untimely death of Bruce Verchere. Bruce killed himself by shooting himself twice in the head on a bright Saturday morning...

By the time Bruce Verchere died his wife already knew about the funds that Mulroney had received through her husband in the Airbus deal, strangely enough, she was able to convinced her husband to come back and live in the family home after she had been advised that she wouldn't be able to recoup the family savings. It wasn't long after that Bruce Verchere allegedly took his own life by first leaving his pregnant concubine to fend for herself with the twins she was expecting.

To add insult to injury, Lynne Verchere named Brian Mulroney has one of the pall bearers for her husband's funeral much to Mulroney's contempt however, it seemed that Brian Mulroney wasn't about to test the will of Lynne Verchere, he accepted. It was at the reception after the funeral that Mulroney couldn't hold his anger any longer and quipped “ the bigger the guilt, the bigger the funeral ”within earshot of Bruce Verchere's kids.

Mulroney's temper didn't help his negotiating position with Lynne Verchere when he attempted to retrieve his documents from Verchere's estate. By that time, the Vercheres had lost just about as much as Mulroney was owed from the Airbus payments that Verchere had held for him in trust.

Mulroney being the negotiator that he was knew that if Lynne Verchere could be exonerated from paying taxes on the amounts she had received from the sale of her company that her husband had handled, then the Vercheres could be left with almost two million dollars on top of the insurance money which amount, might be convincingly soothing for Lynne Verchere, Mulroney proposed to lend the weight of his name to convinced the Canadian Federal tax court that Bruce Verchere had unilaterally omitted to pay taxes on his wife's proceeds from the sale of her company

Lynne Verchere and Brian Mulroney eventually settled their dispute and apparently, Lynne Verchere gave back to Caesar what belongs to Caesar...

A few years went by and Mulroney one night presented Judge Alban Garon with a prestigious award from the Quebec Bar Association. Soon after, Justice Garon was found dead, murdered by a suspected delivery person, the same scenario that Arthur Hailey had written about in his last book entitled Detective, a book he wrote with an implied artistic authority that was inspired by his relationship with Bruce and Lynne Verchere and what he knew of Mulroney's role in the Airbus transactions.

We can't blame professor Johnston for not knowing that the RCMP knew of the relationships between Verchere, Mulroney and Garon but, being the legal mind that he his, professor Johnston couldn't possibly have been able to ascertain beyond doubt that the RCMP had done a stand up job of investigating the Airbus circumstances that involved this cast of characters in the time he had to do it, yet, his convictions were such that he felt obliged to advised that the Oliphant commission cannot explore the Airbus circumstances in their investigations of the business relationship between Karlheinz Schreiber and Brian Mulroney unless, evidence to the contrary would surface during the hearings.

The evidence that links Mulroney to the Airbus cash and the role of Justice Garon however never materialized because Lynne Verchere was never asked to testify publicly and Schreiber was never able to raise the issue since he wasn't allowed to do so according to the terms of reference that Professor Johnston amputated the Oliphant Commission with.

As a result we have Justice Oliphant delivering a report- the irony, that will most likely put the Airbus case to rest at the expense of the life of a federal judge, his wife and their friend.

Now, after reading this, what do you think?